NEURA: A proof-carrying framework for hallucination-resistant neuroimaging automation
Jun XieiD, Jing Wang, Xiumei Wu, Xinyuan Liu, Yiqi Mi, Qinjin Liu, Tong Xu, Chen LiuiD, H H. CheniD, Guo JiD
Abstract
Neuroimaging research depends on heterogeneous software, multimodal data and multistage statistical workflows. Large language model (LLM)-based agents offer a route to automate these workflows, but their susceptibility to hallucination limits their credibility in scientific use. Here we introduce NEURA, a proof-carrying framework for hallucination-resistant neuroimaging automation. NEURA converts free-text research questions and neuroimaging datasets into executable analysis plans, validated outputs and structured reports. The system combines disease- and tool-aware planning with a deterministic verification layer inspired by formal proof: before any claim is retained for reporting, it must be checked against tool-derived evidence and domain axioms. On NeuroEval, an expert-curated benchmark of 110 neuroimaging tasks, NEURA achieved 89.5% planning accuracy, a 30.5% improvement over direct LLM queries. In a controlled hallucination-injection experiment, the verification layer detected all the injected error classes under the specified axiom bank and trust assumptions, with no false positives. In case studies of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3, NEURA reproduced cerebellar atrophy and abnormal diffusion patterns consistent with established pathology and independent expert analyses. Together, these findings show that coupling domain-grounded agency with proof-carrying verification can turn LLM-driven workflow automation from probabilistic self-checking into auditable scientific computation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Large Language Models Can Extract Metadata for Annotation of Human Neuroimaging Publications
Matthew D. Turner, Abhishek Appaji, … Jessica A. Turner·Frontiers in NeuroinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2025
- NeuroVLM: A generative vision-language framework for human neuroimaging
Ryan Hammonds, Jerjes Aguirre-Chavez, … Bradley Voytek·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2026
- CALM-VLM: CALIBRATION AND SELECTIVE PREDICTION IN VISION-LANGUAGE MODELS FOR RELIABLE BRAIN MRI CLASSIFICATION
Nikhil J. Dhinagar, Chirag Jagad, … Paul M. Thompson·IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)Peer-reviewed·Apr 8, 2026
- Illusions of Alignment Between Large Language Models and Brains Emerge From Fragile Methods and Overlooked Confounds
Nima Hadidi, Ebrahim Feghhi, … Jonathan C. Kao·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2025
- NeuroCI: Continuous Integration of Neuroimaging Results Across Software Pipelines and Datasets
Jacob Sanz-Robinson, Arman Jahanpour, … Jean‐Baptiste Poline·bioRxiv·May 30, 2022
- Meta-Analysis of the Functional Neuroimaging Literature with Probabilistic Logic Programming
Majd Abdallah, Valentin Iovène, … Demián Wassermann·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 12, 2022