bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
PanVariants: Best Practice for Pangenome-based Variant Calling Pipeline and Framework
Heng YiiD, Linqi WangiD, Xinrui Chen, Yi DingiD, Andrew W. CarrolliD, Pi-Chuan ChangiD, Kishwar ShafiniD, Lingyun XuiD, Xiaojie Zeng, Xia Zhao, Meihua GongiD, Xiaofang Wei, Yong HouiD, Ming Ni
Abstract
BackgroundAlthough pangenome references offer richer population diversity compared to linear references, current mainstream pangenome-based variant callers are limited to detecting only known variants stored in the graph. To address this limitation, we developed PanVariants, a novel pipeline designed to improve the detection of both known and novel variants accurately. We systematically evaluated its performance against the traditional linear alignment solution (BWA+GATK/Manta) and the existing pangenome-aware solution (DRAGEN/PanGenie) in three contexts: small variants (SNVs/indels) and structural variants (SVs) accuracy in Genome in a Bottle samples, clinical detection on positive samples, and application in cohort-based joint calling. ResultsBy integrating k-mer-based and mapping-based methods, PanVariants significantly reduced variant errors (FPs + FNs), achieving a 73% reduction compared to BWA+GATK and a 45% reduction compared to DRAGEN for SNVs. Retraining the DeepVariant model with high-quality DNBSEQ data further decreased errors by 15%. For SVs detection, PanVariants attained an F1-score of 89.39%, markedly outperforming DRAGEN (68.18%) and BWA+Manta (58.33%), approaching long-read sequencing performance (95.22%). In validation using clinical positive samples, PanVariants successfully detected all expected pathogenic variants while PanGenie failed. In the cohort joint-calling analysis, PanVariants detected more variants, made fewer Mendelian inheritance errors, and gave better per-sample accuracy than GATK. ConclusionsPanVariants establishes a robust framework and best-practice pipeline for pangenome-based variant detection, achieving both sensitive novel variant discovery and high accuracy for SNVs, indels and SVs. Our systematic evaluation of optional processing steps and input variables offers practical guidance for users. Validated across diagnostic and population-based applications, our findings strongly support the transition from linear to pangenome references in future genomics.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pangenome-aware DeepVariant
Mobin Asri, Pi-Chuan Chang, … Kishwar Shafin·bioRxiv·Jun 5, 2025
- On enhancing variation detection through pan-genome indexing
Daniel Valenzuela, Niko Välimäki, … Veli Mäkinen·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2015
- Accuracy and efficiency of germline variant calling pipelines for human genome data
Sen Zhao, Oleg Agafonov, … Eivind J. Hovig·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 19, 2020
- Defining and cataloging variants in pangenome graphs
Pouria Salehi Nowbandegani, Shenghan Zhang, … Luke Jen O’Connor·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Aug 17, 2026
- Personalized Pangenome References
Jouni Sirén, Parsa Eskandar, … Benedict Paten·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2024
- SVPG: A pangenome-based structural variant detection approach and rapid augmentation of pangenome graphs with new samples
Tao Jiang, Heng Kang Hu, … Guohua Wang·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2026