Tail-Robust Quantile Normalization
Abstract
High-throughput biological data - such as mass spectrometry-based proteomics data - suffer from systematic non-biological variance, which is introduced by systematic errors such as batch effects. This hinders the estimation of real biological signals and, thus, decreases the power of statistical tests and biases the identification of differentially expressed sample classes. To remove such unintended variation, while retaining the biological signal of interest, the analysis workflows for mass spectrometry-based quantification typically comprises normalization steps prior to the statistical analysis of the data. Several normalization methods, such as quantile normalization, have originally been developed for microarray data. However, unlike microarray data, proteomics data may contain features, in the form of protein intensities, that are consistently highly abundant across experimental conditions and, hence, are encountered in the tails of the protein intensity distribution. If such proteins are present, statistical inferences of the intensity profiles of the normalized features are impeded through the increased number of false positive findings due to the biased estimation of the variance of the data. Thus, we developed a, freely available, novel approach: tail-robust quantile normalization. It extends the traditional quantile normalization to preserve the biological signals of features in the tails of the distribution over experimental conditions and to account for sample-dependent missing values.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Field percentile
- top 39%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- RobNorm: model-based robust normalization methodfor labeled quantitative mass spectrometry proteomics data
Meng Wang, Lihua Jiang, … Hua Tang·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 9, 2020
- Systematic Evaluation of Normalization Approaches in Tandem Mass Tag and Label-Free Protein Quantification Data Using PRONE
Lis Arend, Klaudia Adamowicz, … Tanja Laske·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 21, 2025
- Smooth Quantile Normalization
Stephanie C. Hicks, Kwame Okrah, … Héctor Corrada Bravo·BiostatisticsPeer-reviewed·May 15, 2017
- Is Protein Quantification and Physical Normalization Always Necessary in Proteomics?
Alex Zelter, Michael E. Riffle, … Michael J. MacCoss·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2026
- When to use Quantile Normalization?
Stephanie C. Hicks, Rafael A. Irizarry·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2014
- Accounting for longitudinal peak quality metrics with MSstats+ enhances differential analysis in proteomic experiments with data-independent acquisition
Devon Kohler, Eralp Doğu, … Olga Vitek A·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2025