bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Tissue-specificity of gene expression in the Ciona embryo is subtly bimodal
Abstract
Expressed genes potentially fall into two distinct categories: tissue-specific genes expressed in a subset of cell types that carry out the distinctive functions of those cells; and housekeeping genes that are broadly expressed across all cell types and carry out the basic functions of life. It is unclear, however, whether these are actually two distinct classes or whether they represent an intuitive but false dichotomy imposed upon gene expression patterns that vary widely and continuously in how specific they are to particular tissues. We address this question using a high-coverage, whole-embryo single cell RNAseq atlas of the model invertebrate chordate Ciona robusta. There is a major complication in that quantitative measures of tissue-specificity such as the Tau and Gini metrics show a strong negative correlation with expression level. We show here that this correlation is the result of sampling error and not a fundamental biological relationship. Raw Tau scores are bimodal, but this is largely an artifact of Taus sigmoidal relationship with expression level for uniformly expressed genes. Simulations and statistical analyses indicate that the Tau metric is badly confounded by expression level for ubiquitously and/or weakly expressed genes but is relatively accurate for genes that have statistical evidence of differential expression. The distribution of tissue-specificity scores for these differentially expressed genes is broad and flat, spanning from near-binary to near-uniform. While only subtly bimodal, ubiquitously expressed and tissue-specific genes are clearly distinguishable, especially at higher expression levels. We explore the use of pseudocounts to shrink the high tissue-specificity scores of weakly expressed genes and find that they are effective at separating tissue-specific from ubiquitously expressed genes but distort rankings of tissue-specificity. Gene ontology code analysis indicates that the most tissue-specific genes are strongly enriched for predicted roles as transcriptional regulators and tissue-specific effector molecules, whereas the most ubiquitously expressed genes are enriched for predicted housekeeping functions. We conclude that the tissue-specific vs housekeeping dichotomy is meaningful in the Ciona embryo despite the broad range of Tau scores for tissue-specific genes. These findings provide a framework for formally assessing the tissue-specificity of gene expression across a broad range of taxa and developmental stages.
- organism: C. elegans
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A benchmark of gene expression tissue-specificity metrics
Nadezda Kryuchkova, Marc Robinson-Rechavi·bioRxiv·Dec 1, 2015
- Comparative analysis of transcriptomic profiles among ascidians, zebrafish, and mice: insights from tissue-specific gene expression
S. Matsubara, T. Osugi, … H. Satake·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2021
- Finding cell-specific expression patterns in the early Ciona embryo with single cell RNA-seq
Garth R Ilsley, Ritsuko Suyama, … Nicholas M. Luscombe·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2020
- Unraveling patterns of disrupted gene expression across a complex tissue
K. E. Hunnicutt, J. M. Good, E. L. Larson·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2021
- Gene specificity landscapes for comparative transcriptomic analysis across tissues, cell types, and species
Erik Bot, José Dávila-Velderrain·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2025
- Conservation of expression regulation throughout the animal kingdom
Michael Kuhn, Andreas Beyer·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2015