Sex and Power: sexual dimorphism in trait variability and its eco-evolutionary and statistical implications
S. R. K. Zajitschek, F. Zajitschek, R. Bonduriansky, R. C. Brooks, W. K. Cornwell, D. S. Falster, M. Lagisz, J. Mason, A. Senior, D. Noble, S. Nakagawa
Abstract
Biomedical and clinical sciences are experiencing a renewed interest in the fact that males and females differ in many anatomic, physiological, and behavioral traits. Sex differences in trait variability, however, are yet to receive similar recognition. In medical science, mammalian females are assumed to have higher trait variability due to estrous cycles (the estrus-mediated variability hypothesis); historically in biomedical research, females have been excluded for this reason. Contrastingly, evolutionary theory and associated data support the greater male variability hypothesis. Here, we test these competing hypotheses in 218 traits measured in >26,900 mice, using meta-analysis methods. Neither hypothesis could universally explain patterns in trait variability. Sex-bias in variability was trait-dependent. While greater male variability was found in morphological traits, females were much more variable in immunological traits. Sex-specific variability has eco-evolutionary ramifications including sex-dependent responses to climate change, as well as statistical implications including power analysis considering sex difference in variance.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multivariate models of animal sex: breaking binaries leads to a better understanding of ecology and evolution
J. F. McLaughlin, K. M. Brock, … S. Lipshutz·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2023
- New estimates indicate that males are not larger than females in most mammals
K. J. Tombak, S. B. S. W. Hex, D. I. Rubenstein·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2023
- Female resource limitation does not make the opportunity for selection more female biased.
i. martinossi-allibert, J. Liljestrand Ronn, E. Immonen·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2019
- The macroevolutionary dynamics of mammalian sexual size dimorphism
M. E. Jones, C. Sheard·bioRxiv·May 31, 2023
- Amplification is the Primary Mode of Gene-by-Sex Interaction in Complex Human Traits
Carrie Zhu, Matthew J. Ming, … Arbel Harpak·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Apr 6, 2023
- Sex-different phenotypic correlations: Due to genes or environment?
Amelie Fritz, Liza Darrous, … Zoltán Kutalik·medRxiv·Jul 15, 2026