bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
TMS-EEG Indices to Define Local Cortical Excitability Thresholds
Ilkka RissaneniD, Ida GranöiD, Victor Hugo SouzaiD, Sabin SathyaniD, Nivethida ThirugnanasambandamiD, Risto Juhani IlmoniemiiD, Pantelis LioumisiD
Abstract
IntroductionTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely employed to treat various psychiatric and neurological disorders. However, TMS protocols typically rely on generalizations, particularly in selecting stimulation intensities, leading to suboptimal and variable outcomes. Combining TMS with electroencephalography (EEG) offers a potential solution by allowing direct monitoring of stimulation effects. In this study, we investigate how features of the TMS-EEG signal change with intensity to identify thresholds implying qualitative shifts in the brain response. MethodsWe stimulated eight subjects at both the primary motor cortex (M1) and the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) with navigated TMS at 15 closely spaced intensities and measured TMS-evoked EEG responses (TMS-evoked potential, TEP) with 60 trials per intensity. TEP thresholds were identified with three methods: by selecting the intensity where the TEP peak-to-peak exceeds 6 V, or by fitting either piecewise-linear or sigmoid curves into the power spectral density (PSD) frequency components to identify nonlinear intensity behavior. ResultsThe identified TEP thresholds varied depending on subject, target, and identification method. In M1, the thresholds attained with the fixed-amplitude and piecewise PSD fit methods averaged around the motor threshold, and in pre-SMA around 120% of the motor threshold. The TEP thresholds yielded by the sigmoid fit method were higher in intensity, and least consistent between subjects. ConclusionsOur findings support the hypothesis that detectable changes in EEG patterns occur at specific TMS intensities. These results provide a basis for individualized stimulation dosing, potentially enhancing therapeutic efficacy and reliability. Future research should focus on refining these methods and validating their clinical applicability across diverse conditions and patient populations.
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities
Natalie Schaworonkow, Jochen Triesch, … Christoph Zrenner·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2018
- Predictive modeling of TMS-evoked responses: Unraveling instantaneous excitability states
Oskari Ahola, Lisa Haxel, … Ulf Ziemann·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2025
- The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation
Mana Biabani, Alex Fornito, … Nigel C. Rogasch·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2021
- Immediate TMS-EEG responses reveal motor cortex excitability
Antonietta Stango, Agnese Zazio, … Marta Bortoletto·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2025
- Methodological choices matter: A systematic comparison of TMS-EEG studies targeting the primary motor cortex
Mikkel Malling Beck, Marieke Heyl, … Hartwig Roman Siebner·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Oct 15, 2024
- Pinging the Brain with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Cortical Reactivity in Time and Space
Sangtae Ahn, Flavio Frӧhlich·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2021