The Journal of PhysiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation
Mana BiabaniiD, Alex FornitoiD, James P. CoxoniD, Ben FulcheriD, Nigel C. RogaschiD
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a powerful tool to investigate cortical circuits. Changes in cortical excitability following TMS are typically assessed by measuring changes in either conditioned motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) following paired-pulse TMS over motor cortex or evoked potentials measured with electroencephalography following single-pulse TMS (TEPs). However, it is unclear whether these two measures of cortical excitability index the same cortical response. Twenty-four healthy participants received local and interhemispheric paired-pulse TMS over motor cortex with eight inter-pulse intervals, suband suprathreshold conditioning intensities, and two different pulse waveforms, while MEPs were recorded from a hand muscle. TEPs were also recorded in response to single-pulse TMS using the conditioning pulse alone. The relationships between TEPs and conditioned-MEPs were evaluated using metrics sensitive to both their magnitude at each timepoint and their overall shape across time. The impacts of undesired sensory potentials resulting from TMS pulse and muscle contractions were also assessed on both measures. Both conditioned-MEPs and TEPs were sensitive to re-afferent somatosensory activity following motor-evoked responses, but over different post-stimulus timepoints. Moreover, the amplitude of low-frequency oscillations in TEPs was strongly correlated with the sensory potentials, whereas early and local high-frequency responses showed minimal relationships. Accordingly, conditioned-MEPs did not correlate with TEPs in the time domain but showed high shape similarity with the amplitude of high-frequency oscillations in TEPs. Therefore, despite the effects of sensory confounds, the TEP and MEP measures share a response component, suggesting that they index a similar cortical response and perhaps the same neuronal populations.
- Citations
- 41
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Immediate TMS-EEG responses reveal motor cortex excitability
Antonietta Stango, Agnese Zazio, … Marta Bortoletto·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2025
- The Spectral Features Of EEG Responses To Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Of The Primary Motor Cortex Depend On The Amplitude Of The Motor Evoked Potentials
Matteo Fecchio, Andrea Pigorini, … Mario Rosanova·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2017
- Pinging the Brain with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Cortical Reactivity in Time and Space
Sangtae Ahn, Flavio Frӧhlich·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2021
- The influence of somatosensory and auditory evoked potentials on concurrent transcranial-magnetic stimulation electroencephalography recordings
Nahian Shahmat Chowdhury, Nigel C. Rogasch, … Siobhan M. Schabrun·bioRxiv·Nov 17, 2021
- Predictive modeling of TMS-evoked responses: Unraveling instantaneous excitability states
Oskari Ahola, Lisa Haxel, … Ulf Ziemann·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Oct 31, 2025
- Not two sides of the same coin: Divergent effects of motor state on corticospinal and cortical responses to TMS of motor cortex
Mikkel Malling Beck, Lasse Christiansen, … Hartwig Roman Siebner·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2025