IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Deep convolutional and recurrent neural networks for cell motility discrimination and prediction
Abstract
Cells in culture display diverse motility behaviors that may reflect differences in cell state and function, providing motivation to discriminate between different motility behaviors. Current methods to do so rely upon manual feature engineering. However, the types of features necessary to distinguish between motility behaviors can vary greatly depending on the biological context, and it is not always clear which features may be most predictive in each setting for distinguishing particular cell types or disease states. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are machine learning models allowing for relevant features to be learned directly from spatial data. Similarly, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are a class of models capable of learning long term temporal dependencies. Given that cell motility is inherently spacio-temporal data, we present an approach utilizing both convolutional and long- short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network units to analyze cell motility data. These RNN models provide accurate classification of simulated motility and experimentally measured motility from multiple cell types, comparable to results achieved with hand-engineered features. The variety of cell motility differences we can detect suggests that the algorithm is generally applicable to additional cell types not analyzed here. RNN autoencoders based on the same architecture are capable of learning motility features in an unsupervised manner and capturing variation between myogenic cells in the latent space. Adapting these RNN models to motility prediction, RNNs are capable of predicting muscle stem cell motility from past tracking data with performance superior to standard motion prediction models. This advance in cell motility prediction may be of practical utility in cell tracking applications.
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: trajectory inference
- approach: deep learning
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 49
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Field percentile
- top 10%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predicting the future direction of cell movement with convolutional neural networks
Shori Nishimoto, Yuta Tokuoka, … Akira Funahashi·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2019
- Automatic Detection of Cell-cycle Stages using Recurrent Neural Networks
Abin Jose, Rijo Roy, … Johannes Stegmaier·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Mar 11, 2024
- END-TO-END CLASSIFICATION OF CELL-CYCLE STAGES WITH CENTER-CELL FOCUS TRACKER USING RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS
Abin Jose, Rijo Roy, … Johannes Stegmaier·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2022
- Considerations in using recurrent neural networks to probe neural dynamics
Jonathan C. Kao·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2019
- Automatic Single-Cell Discrimination by Cellular Appearance using Convolutional Neural Network
Y. Matsuoka, R. Nakatsuka, T. Fujioka·bioRxiv·Oct 30, 2018
- Simultaneous quantification of dynamic bacterial deformation and motility by machine learning
Kyosuke Takabe, Souichi Ugawa, … Shuichi Nakamura·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2026