Identification and copy number variant analysis of enhancer regions of genes causing spinocerebellar ataxia
Fatemeh GhorbaniiD, Eddy N. de BoeriD, Michiel R. Fokkens, Jelkje J. de Boer-BergsmaiD, Corien C. Verschuuren‐BemelmansiD, Elles Wierenga, Hamidreza KasaeiiD, Daan NoordermeeriD, Dineke S. VerbeekiD, Helga WestersiD, Cleo C. van DiemeniD
Abstract
Currently, routine diagnostics for spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) consist of analyses that look for polyQ repeat expansions and conventional variations affecting the proteins encoded by known SCA genes. Despite all the effort, [~]40% of the patients still remain without a genetic diagnosis after routine tests. Increasing evidence suggests that variations in the enhancer regions of genes involved in neurodegenerative disorders can also be disease-causing. Since the enhancers of SCA genes are not yet known, it remains to be determined whether variations in these regions are a cause of SCA. In this pilot project, we aimed to identify the enhancers of the SCA genes ATXN1, ATXN3, TBP and ITPR1 in human cerebellum using 4C-seq experiments, publicly available datasets, reciprocal 4C-seq and luciferase assays. We then screened these enhancers for copy number variants (CNVs) in a cohort of genetically undiagnosed SCA patients. We identified two active enhancers for each of the four SCA genes in human cerebellar tissue. In addition, for TBP and ITPR1, we observed interactions between the putative enhancers of each gene. CNV analysis did not reveal any CNVs in the active enhancers of the four SCA genes in any of the genetically undiagnosed SCA patients. However, in one patient, we noted a CNV deletion with unknown clinical significance near one of the active enhancers of ITPR1. These results not only reveal elements involved in regulation of SCA genes, they can also lead to the discovery of novel SCA-causing genetic variants. As enhancer variations are increasingly recognized to cause brain disorders, screening the enhancers of ATXN1, ATXN3, TBP and ITPR1 for variations other than CNVs and identifying and screening enhancers of other SCA genes might elucidate the genetic cause in genetically undiagnosed patients.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.35
- Field percentile
- top 46%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A coding CAG repeat expansion in EP400 causes Spinocerebellar Ataxia
Stijn V. Weckesser, Nataša Mišković, … Katja Lohmann·medRxiv·Oct 21, 2026
- Computational and experimental hunt for expansion prone tandem CNG repeats in human genomes
Varun Suroliya, Bharathram Uppili, … Mohammed Faruq·bioRxiv·May 3, 2023
- Duplication within 14q32.13 implicates a chimeric CLMN::SYNE3 RNA transcript in cerebellar ataxia
Thomas M Litster, Robert A. Wilcox, … Jozef Gécz·medRxiv·Apr 24, 2026
- Spinocerebellar ataxia type 4 is caused by a GGC expansion in the ZFHX3 gene and is associated with prominent dysautonomia and motor neuron signs
Martin Paucar, Daniel Nilsson, … Per Svenningsson·Journal of Internal MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jul 7, 2024
- Prevalence of RFC1-Mediated Spinocerebellar Ataxia in a United States Ataxia Cohort
Dona Aboud Syriani, Darice Y. Wong, … Brent L. Fogel·Neurology GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2020
- SCA4 locus-associated gene Ronin (Thap11) increases Ataxin-1 protein levels and induces cerebellar degeneration in a mouse model of ataxia
Thomas P. Zwaka, Ronald Richman, Marion Déjosez·bioRxiv·Mar 4, 2020