bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Gene identity, not variant effect, dominates ClinVar benchmarks of missense pathogenicity predictors
Saad HarriziiD, Imane Nait IrahaliD, Mostafa KabineiD, Damien ArnoultiD
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
Missense pathogenicity predictors are routinely benchmarked against ClinVar, whose labels are strongly structured by gene: genes under diagnostic scrutiny accumulate pathogenic submissions while incidentally sequenced genes accumulate benign ones. We asked how much of a benchmark score this structure alone can produce. On 197,904 ClinVar missense variants validated against UniProt canonical sequences, a null model using no variant-level information, scoring each variant only by the pathogenic fraction of its own gene, reaches an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.921 under a random 10-fold split. On a common intersection of 169,989 variants, four current predictors exceed it by only 0.036 to 0.044. The inflation is not uniform, so it does not cancel when predictors are compared: under within-gene evaluation the ranking inverts, AlphaMissense rising from third to first and gMVP falling to third (p < 0.0001). The inversion survives removal of ceiling genes and replicates on an independently curated benchmark. Because both rankings derive from the same ClinVar labels, we arbitrated between them using data with no gene-level structure: agreement with 47 human deep mutational scanning assays matches the within-gene ranking and inverts the conventional one (p = 0.027, 0.0023). Across twenty-two dbNSFP predictors scored on one common intersection of 112,248 variants, with each tool's exposure to clinical labels registered before any score was extracted, predictors never trained on such labels sit 0.051 AUROC behind supervised ones globally but only 0.026 behind within genes (difference +0.025 [+0.023, +0.027], p < 0.0001). Leave-one-out correction, the standard remedy, is worth 0.002 AUROC. Much of ClinVar benchmark performance reflects gene identity rather than variant effect, and the distortion changes which predictor a benchmark ranks first, in a direction experimental data contradicts. We release genenull, a single-file implementation, so reporting this baseline costs one function call.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Critical assessment of missense variant effect predictors on disease-relevant variant data
Ruchir Rastogi, Ryan Chung, … Nilah M. Ioannidis·Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2025
- AnnotateMissense: a genome-wide annotation and benchmarking framework for missense pathogenicity prediction
Muhammad Muneeb, David Benjamin Ascher·bioRxiv·May 4, 2026
- Assessment of variant effect predictors unveils variants difficulty as a critical performance indicator
Ragousandirane Radjasandirane, Julien Diharce, … Alexandre G. de Brevern·GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Mar 22, 2025
- An openly licensed benchmark and per-gene calibration map for missense pathogenicity predictors on activating cancer drivers
Sung‐Gwon Lee·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2026
- Understanding the heterogeneous performance of variant effect predictors across human protein-coding genes
Fawzy Mohamed, Joseph A. Marsh·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2024
- AlphaMissense is better correlated with functional assays of missense impact than earlier prediction algorithms
Alicia Ljungdahl, Sayeh Kohani, … Stephan Sanders·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2023