Large-scale evaluation of outcomes following a genetic diagnosis in children with severe developmental disorders
Harriet CopelandiD, Karen Jaqueline LowiD, Sarah Wynn, Ayesha AhmediD, Victoria Arthur, Meena BalasubramanianiD, Katya Bennett, Jonathan N. BergiD, Marta BértoliiD, Lisa BrysoniD, Catrin Bucknall, Jamie CampbelliD, Kate Chandler, Jaynee Chauhan, Amy Clarkson, Rachel Coles, Hector Conti, Philandra Costello, Tessa Coupar, Amy CraigiD, John DeaniD, Amy DilloniD, Abhijit DixitiD, Kathryn Drew, Jacqueline EasoniD, , Caroline Fiona WrightiD
Abstract
ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate outcomes for clinical management following a genetic diagnosis from the Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) Study. DesignIndividuals in the DDD study who had a pathogenic/likely pathogenic genotype in the DECIPHER database were selected for inclusion (n=5010). Clinical notes from regional clinical genetics services notes were reviewed to assess pre-defined clinical outcomes relating to interventions, prenatal choices, and information provision. ResultsOutcomes were recorded for 4237 diagnosed probands (85% of those eligible) from all 24 recruiting centres across the UK and Ireland. Additional diagnostic or screening tests were performed in 903 (21%) probands through referral to a range of different clinical specialties, and stopped or avoided in a further 26 (0.6%). Disease-specific treatment was started in 85 (2%) probands, including seizure-control medications and dietary supplements, and contra-indicated medications were stopped/avoided as no longer necessary in a further 20 (0.5%). The option of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing was discussed with 1204 (28%) families, despite the relatively advanced age of the parents at the time of diagnosis. Importantly, condition-specific information or literature was given to 3214 (76%) families, and 880 (21%) were involved in family support groups. In the most common condition (KBG syndrome; 79 (2%) probands), clinical interventions only partially reflected the temporal development of phenotypes, highlighting the importance of consensus management guidelines and patient support groups. ConclusionsOur results underscore the importance of achieving a clinico-molecular diagnosis to ensure timely onward referral of patients, enabling appropriate care and anticipatory surveillance, and for accessing relevant patient support groups.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Systematic assessment of outcomes following a genetic diagnosis identified through a large-scale research study into developmental disorders
H. Copeland, Emma C. Kivuva, … Caroline Fiona Wright·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 20, 2021
- Optimising diagnostic yield in highly penetrant genomic disease
Caroline Fiona Wright, Patrick H. Campbell, … Helen V. Firth·medRxiv·Jul 25, 2022
- Information and genetic counselling for psychiatric risks in children with rare disorders
Andrew Cuthbert, Aimée Challenger, … Marianne B. M. van den Bree·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2019
- "They don't know how to live with a child with these conditions, they can't understand...": The lived experiences of parenting a child with a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder.
Karen Jaqueline Low, Georgia Treneman‐Evans, … Jenny C Ingram·medRxiv·Jul 24, 2024
- The Implementation, Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Outcome of Genetic Testing on an Inpatient Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Service
Aaron D. Besterman, Joshua Sadik, … Julián A. Martínez-Agosto·Autism ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2020
- Genetic Counselor Utilization Across Non-Genetics Departments for Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Jordan Janae Cole, Julie S. Cohen, … Colleen A. Campbell·medRxiv·Jul 21, 2026