The Genomic Ecosystem of Transposable Elements in Maize
M. C. Stitzer, S. N. Anderson, N. M. Springer, J. Ross-Ibarra
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) constitute the majority of flowering plant DNA, reflecting their tremendous success in subverting, avoiding, and surviving the defenses of their host genomes to ensure their selfish replication. More than 85% of the sequence of the maize genome can be ascribed to past transposition, providing a major contribution to the structure of the genome. Evidence from individual loci has informed our understanding of how transposition has shaped the genome, and a number of individual TE insertions have been causally linked to dramatic phenotypic changes. But genome-wide analyses in maize and other taxa have frequently represented TEs as a relatively homogeneous class of fragmentary relics of past transposition, obscuring their evolutionary history and interaction with their host genome. Using an updated annotation of structurally intact TEs in the maize reference genome, we investigate the family-level ecological and evolutionary dynamics of TEs in maize. Integrating a variety of data, from descriptors of individual TEs like coding capacity, expression, and methylation, as well as similar features of the sequence they inserted into, we model the relationship between these attributes of the genomic environment and the survival of TE copies and families. Our analyses reveal a diversity of ecological strategies of TE families, each representing the evolution of a distinct ecological niche allowing survival of the TE family. In contrast to the wholesale relegation of all TEs to a single category of junk DNA, these differences generate a rich ecology of the genome, suggesting families of TEs that coexist in time and space compete and cooperate with each other. We conclude that while the impact of transposition is highly family- and context-dependent, a family-level understanding of the ecology of TEs in the genome can refine our ability to predict the role of TEs in generating genetic and phenotypic diversity. Lumping our beautiful collection of transposons into a single category is a crime -Michael R. Freeling, Mar. 10, 2017
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transposable elements contribute to dynamic genome content in maize
Sarah N. Anderson, Michelle C. Stitzer, … Nathan M. Springer·The Plant JournalPeer-reviewed·Aug 5, 2019
- Whole Genome Variation of Transposable Element Insertions in a Maize Diversity Panel
Y. Qiu, C. O'Connor, … C. Hirsch·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2020
- Dynamic patterns of transcript abundance of transposable element families in maize
Sarah N. Anderson, Michelle C. Stitzer, … Nathan M. Springer·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 10, 2019
- Transposable element abundance subtly contributes to lower fitness in maize
M. C. Stitzer, M. B. Khaipho-Burch, … E. S. Buckler·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2023
- Combined analysis of transposable elements and structural variation in maize genomes reveals genome contraction outpaces expansion
Manisha Munasinghe, Andrew C. Read, … Nathan M. Springer·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 22, 2023
- Differences in activity and stability drive transposable element variation in tropical and temperate maize.
Shujun Ou, Armin Scheben, … Candice N. Hirsch·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2024