Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists
Abstract
In many countries the publics main source of information about science and technology is the mass media. Unfortunately, in recent years traditional journalism has experienced a collapse, and science journalism has been a major casualty. One potential remedy is to encourage scientists to write for news media about science. On these general news platforms, scientists stories would have to compete for attention with other news stories on hard (e.g. politics) and entertaining (e.g. celebrity news) topics written by professional writers. Do they stand a chance?\n\nThis study aimed to quantitatively characterize audience interactions as an indicator of interest in science news stories authored by early career scientists (henceforth scientists) trained to function as science reporters, as compared to news items written by reporters and published in the same news outlets.\n\nTo measure users behavior, we collected data on the number of clicks, likes, comments and average time spent on page. The sample was composed of 150 science items written by 50 scientists trained to contribute popular science stories in the Davidson Institute of Science Education reporters program and published on two major Israeli news websites - Mako and Ynet between July 2015 to January 2018. Each science item was paired with another item written by the websites organic reporter, and published on the same channel as the science story (e.g., tourism, health) and the same close time. Overall significant differences were not found in the publics engagement with the different items. Although, on one website there was a significant difference on two out of four engagement types, the second website did not have any difference, e.g., people did not click, like or comment more on items written by organic reporters than on the stories written by scientists. This creates an optimistic starting point for filling the science news void by scientists as science reporters.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- "It's my job": A qualitative study of the mediatization of science within the scientist-journalist relationship
L. L. Moorhead, A. Fleerackers, L. A. Maggio·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2022
- From impact metrics and open science to communicating research: Journalists' awareness of academic controversies
Alice Fleerackers, Laura L. Moorhead, … Lauren A. Maggio·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jan 27, 2025
- Survey-Based Analysis of a Science of Science Communication Scientific Interest Group: Member Feedback and Perspectives on Science Communication
Anna J. Hilliard, Nicola Sugden, … Chris Gunter·Journal of Science CommunicationPeer-reviewed·May 26, 2025
- Evolving Structure and Diversity of Human Narratives in the Journal of Stories in Science
R. Q. Mach, J. W. Tsai, F. J. Muindi·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2020
- Engagement in science content via online video leveraging television science fiction (Star Trek: Discovery)
M. A. F. Noor, K. Manturuk·bioRxiv·Mar 12, 2023
- Rewarding, but poorly rewarded: Gendered narratives of science communication in the life sciences
Perry G. Beasley‐Hall, Pam Papadelos, … Michelle T. Guzik·bioRxiv·Feb 28, 2024