bioRxivBioinformatics
LMethyR-SVM: Predict human enhancers using low methylated regions based on weighted support vector machines
Abstract
BackgroundThe identification of enhancer is a challenging task. Various types of epigenetic information including histone modification have been utilized in the construction of enhancer prediction models based on a diverse panel of machine learning models. However, DNA methylation profiles generated from the whole genome bisulfate sequencing (WGBS) have not been fully explored for their potential in enhancer prediction despite the fact that low methylated regions (LMRs) have been implied to be distal active regulatory regions.\n\nMethodIn this work we propose a prediction framework, LMethyR-SVM, using LMRs identified from cell-type-specific WGBS DNA methylation profiles based on an unlabeled-negative learning framework. In LMethyR-SVM, the set of cell-type-specific LMRs is further divided into three sets: reliable positive, like positive, and likely negative, according to their resemblance to a small set of experimentally validated enhancers in the VISTA database based on an estimated non-parametric density distribution. Then, the prediction model is trained by solving a weighted support vector machine.\n\nResultsWe demonstrate the performance of LMethyR-SVM by using the WGBS DNA methylation profiles derived from the H1 human embryonic stem cell type (H1) and the fetal lung fibroblast cell type (IMR90). The predicted enhancers are highly conserved with a reasonable validation rate based on a set of commonly used positive markers including transcription factors, p300 binding and DNase-I hypersensitive sites. In addition, we show evidence that the large fraction of LMethyR-SVM predicted enhancers are not predicted by ChromHMM in H1 cell type and they are more enriched for the FANTOM5 enhancers.\n\nConclusionOur work suggests that low methylated regions detected from the WGBS data are useful as complementary resources to histone modification marks in developing models for the prediction of cell type-specific enhancers.
- organism: human
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: database / resource
- approach: statistical model
- approach: machine learning (classical)
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- DNA methylation oscillation defines classes of enhancers
Emanuele Libertini, Rifat Hamoudi, … Stephan Beck·bioRxiv·Oct 10, 2018
- Genome-wide active enhancer identification using cell type-specific signatures of epigenomic activity
Shalu Jhanwar, Stephan Ossowski, José Dávila-Velderrain·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2018
- A cross-organism framework for supervised enhancer prediction with epigenetic pattern recognition and targeted validation
Anurag Sethi, Mengting Gu, … Mark Gerstein·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2020
- Enhancer prediction in the human genome by probabilistic modelling of the chromatin feature patterns
Maria Osmala, Harri J Lähdesmäki·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2020
- SeqEnhDL: sequence-based classification of cell type-specific enhancers using deep learning models
Yupeng Wang, Rosario B. Jaime-Lara, … Paule V. Joseph·BMC Research NotesPeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2021
- Explainable AI identifies H3K18ac as a new marker of active enhancers
Khizra Maqsood, Duarte Polvora Brandao, … Nicolae Radu Zabet·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2026