A cross-organism framework for supervised enhancer prediction with epigenetic pattern recognition and targeted validation
Anurag SethiiD, Mengting GuiD, Emrah GumusgoziD, Landon Long ChaniD, Koon‐Kiu YaniD, Joel S. RozowskyiD, Iros BarozziiD, Veena AfzaliD, Jennifer A. AkiyamaiD, Ingrid Plajzer-Frick, Chengfei YaniD, Catherine S. Novak, Momoe KatoiD, Tyler H. GarviniD, Quan T. Pham, Anne N. HarringtoniD, Brandon J. MannioniD, Elizabeth A. LeeiD, Y. FukudaiD, Axel ViseliD, Diane E. DickeliD, Kevin Yuk-Lap YipiD, Richard E. SuttoniD, Len A. PennacchioiD, Mark GersteiniD
Abstract
Enhancers are important noncoding elements, but they have been traditionally hard to characterize experimentally. Only a few mammalian enhancers have been validated, making it difficult to train statistical models for their identification properly. Instead, postulated patterns of genomic features have been used heuristically for identification. The development of massively parallel assays allows for the characterization of large numbers of enhancers for the first time. Here, we developed a framework that uses Drosophila STARR-seq data to create shape-matching filters based on enhancer-associated meta-profiles of epigenetic features. We combined these features with supervised machine learning algorithms (e.g., support vector machines) to predict enhancers. We demonstrated that our model could be applied to predict enhancers in mammalian species (i.e., mouse and human). We comprehensively validated the predictions using a combination of in vivo and in vitro approaches, involving transgenic assays in mouse and transduction-based reporter assays in human cell lines. Overall, the validations involved 153 enhancers in 6 mouse tissues and 4 human cell lines. The results confirmed that our model can accurately predict enhancers in different species without re-parameterization. Finally, we examined the transcription-factor binding patterns at predicted enhancers and promoters in human cell lines. We demonstrated that these patterns enable the construction of a secondary model effectively discriminating between enhancers and promoters.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 109
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- EnhancerDetector: Enhancer Discovery from Human to Fly via Interpretable Deep Learning
Luis M. Solis, Geyenna Sterling-Lentsch, … Hani Z. Girgis·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- The Sheep and the Goats: Distinguishing transcriptional enhancers in a complex chromatin landscape
Anne Sonnenschein, Ian M. Dworkin, David N. Arnosti·bioRxiv·May 25, 2018
- Deep learning reveals evolutionary conservation and divergence of sequence properties underlying gene regulatory enhancers across mammals
L. Chen, A. E. Fish, J. A. Capra·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2018
- Exploiting regulatory heterogeneity to systematically identify enhancers with high accuracy
Hamutal Arbel, Sumanta Basu, … James B. Brown·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2018
- Enhancer prediction in the human genome by probabilistic modelling of the chromatin feature patterns
Maria Osmala, Harri J Lähdesmäki·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2020
- Genome-wide active enhancer identification using cell type-specific signatures of epigenomic activity
Shalu Jhanwar, Stephan Ossowski, José Dávila-Velderrain·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2018