NeuroImageNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
A humanness dimension to visual object coding in the brain
Erika W. ContiniiD, Erin GoddardiD, Tijl GrootswagersiD, Mark WilliamsiD, Thomas A. CarlsoniD
Abstract
Neuroimaging studies investigating human object recognition have largely focused on a relatively small number of object categories, in particular, faces, bodies, scenes, and vehicles. More recent studies have taken a broader focus, investigating hypothesised dichotomies, for example animate versus inanimate, and continuous feature dimensions, such as biologically similarity. These studies typically have used stimuli that are clearly identified as animate or inanimate, neglecting objects that may not fit into this dichotomy. We generated a novel stimulus set including standard objects and objects that blur the animate-inanimate dichotomy, for example robots and toy animals. We used MEG time-series decoding to study the brains emerging representation of these objects. Our analysis examined contemporary models of object coding such as dichotomous animacy, as well as several new higher order models that take into account an objects capacity for agency (i.e. its ability to move voluntarily) and capacity to experience the world. We show that early brain responses are best accounted for by low-level visual similarity of the objects; and shortly thereafter, higher order models of agency/experience best explained the brains representation of the stimuli. Strikingly, a model of human-similarity provided the best account for the brains representation after an initial perceptual processing phase. Our findings provide evidence for a new dimension of object coding in the human brain - one that has a \"human-centric\" focus.
- organism: human
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 32
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Untangling featural and conceptual object representations
Tijl Grootswagers, Amanda K. Robinson, … Thomas A. Carlson·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2019
- Disentangling five dimensions of animacy in human brain and behaviour
Kamila Maria Jozwik, Elias Najarro, … Nikolaus Kriegeskorte·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2022
- Animate-inanimate object categorization from minimal visual information in the human brain, human behavior, and deep neural networks
Céline Spriet, Farzad Rostami, … Liuba Papeo·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2026
- MEG sensor patterns reflect perceptual but not categorical similarity of animate and inanimate objects
Daria Proklova, DANIEL H. KAISER, Marius V. Peelen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2019
- Mid-level feature differences underlie early animacy and object size distinctions: Evidence from EEG decoding
Ruosi Wang, Daniel Janini, Talia Konkle·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2022
- Mapping object space dimensions: new insights from temporal dynamics
Alexis Kidder, Genevieve L. Quek, Tijl Grootswagers·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025