Untangling featural and conceptual object representations
Tijl GrootswagersiD, Amanda K. RobinsoniD, Sophia M. ShatekiD, Thomas A. CarlsoniD
Abstract
How are visual inputs transformed into conceptual representations by the human visual system? The contents of human perception, such as objects presented on a visual display, can reliably be decoded from voxel activation patterns in fMRI, and in evoked sensor activations in MEG and EEG. A prevailing question is the extent to which brain activation associated with object categories is due to statistical regularities of visual features within object categories. Here, we assessed the contribution of mid-level features to conceptual category decoding using EEG and a novel fast periodic decoding paradigm. Our study used a stimulus set consisting of intact objects from the animate (e.g., fish) and inanimate categories (e.g., chair) and scrambled versions of the same objects that were unrecognizable and preserved their visual features (Long, Yu, & Konkle, 2018). By presenting the images at different periodic rates, we biased processing to different levels of the visual hierarchy. We found that scrambled objects and their intact counterparts elicited similar patterns of activation, which could be used to decode the conceptual category (animate or inanimate), even for the unrecognizable scrambled objects. Animacy decoding for the scrambled objects, however, was only possible at the slowest periodic presentation rate. Animacy decoding for intact objects was faster, more robust, and could be achieved at faster presentation rates. Our results confirm that the mid-level visual features preserved in the scrambled objects contribute to animacy decoding, but also demonstrate that the dynamics vary markedly for intact versus scrambled objects. Our findings suggest a complex interplay between visual feature coding and categorical representations that is mediated by the visual systems capacity to use image features to resolve a recognisable object.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 49
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Animate-inanimate object categorization from minimal visual information in the human brain, human behavior, and deep neural networks
Céline Spriet, Farzad Rostami, … Liuba Papeo·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2026
- Mid-level feature differences underlie early animacy and object size distinctions: Evidence from EEG decoding
Ruosi Wang, Daniel Janini, Talia Konkle·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2022
- Contributions of early and mid-level visual cortex to high-level object categorization
Lily E. Kramer, Yi-Chia Chen, … Marlene R. Cohen·bioRxiv·May 31, 2023
- A humanness dimension to visual object coding in the brain
Erika W. Contini, Erin Goddard, … Thomas A. Carlson·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jul 11, 2020
- MEG sensor patterns reflect perceptual but not categorical similarity of animate and inanimate objects
Daria Proklova, DANIEL H. KAISER, Marius V. Peelen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2019
- Mapping object space dimensions: new insights from temporal dynamics
Alexis Kidder, Genevieve L. Quek, Tijl Grootswagers·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025