MEG sensor patterns reflect perceptual but not categorical similarity of animate and inanimate objects
Abstract
Human high-level visual cortex shows a distinction between animate and inanimate objects, as revealed by fMRI. Recent studies have shown that object animacy can similarly be decoded from MEG sensor patterns. Which object properties drive this decoding? Here, we disentangled the influence of perceptual and categorical object properties by presenting perceptually matched objects (e.g., snake and rope) that were nonetheless easily recognizable as being animate or inanimate. In a series of behavioral experiments, three aspects of perceptual dissimilarity of these objects were quantified: overall dissimilarity, outline dissimilarity, and texture dissimilarity. Neural dissimilarity of MEG sensor patterns was modeled using regression analysis, in which perceptual dissimilarity (from the behavioral experiments) and categorical dissimilarity served as predictors of neural dissimilarity. We found that perceptual dissimilarity was strongly reflected in MEG sensor patterns from 80ms after stimulus onset, with separable contributions of outline and texture dissimilarity. Surprisingly, when controlling for perceptual dissimilarity, MEG patterns did not carry information about object category (animate vs inanimate) at any time point. Nearly identical results were found in a second MEG experiment that required basic-level object recognition. These results suggest that MEG sensor patterns do not capture object animacy independently of perceptual differences between animate and inanimate objects. This is in contrast to results observed in fMRI using the same stimuli, task, and analysis approach: fMRI showed a highly reliable categorical distinction in visual cortex even when controlling for perceptual dissimilarity. Results thus point to a discrepancy in the information contained in multivariate fMRI and MEG patterns.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 63
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Animate-inanimate object categorization from minimal visual information in the human brain, human behavior, and deep neural networks
Céline Spriet, Farzad Rostami, … Liuba Papeo·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2026
- Hard-to-beat animacy perception: EEG evidence of accurate animate-inanimate distinction for ambiguous objects
Farzad Rostami, Céline Spriet, … Liuba Papeo·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2026
- Asymmetric compression of representational space for object animacy categorization under degraded viewing conditions
Tijl Grootswagers, J. Brendan Ritchie, … Thomas A. Carlson·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 18, 2017
- Untangling featural and conceptual object representations
Tijl Grootswagers, Amanda K. Robinson, … Thomas A. Carlson·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2019
- Comparative fMRI reveals differences in the functional organization of the visual cortex for animacy perception in dogs and humans
Eszter Borbála Farkas, Raúl Hernández-Pérez, … Attila Andics·bioRxiv·Nov 12, 2024
- Disentangling five dimensions of animacy in human brain and behaviour
Kamila Maria Jozwik, Elias Najarro, … Nikolaus Kriegeskorte·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2022