Animate-inanimate object categorization from minimal visual information in the human brain, human behavior, and deep neural networks
Céline SprietiD, Farzad RostamiiD, Jean‐Rémy HochmanniD, Liuba PapeoiD
Abstract
The distinction between animate and inanimate things is a main organizing principle of information in perception and cognition. Yet, animacy, as a visual property, has so far eluded operationalization. Which visual features are necessary and sufficient to see animacy? At which level of the visual hierarchy does the animate-inanimate distinction emerge? Here, we show that the animate-inanimate distinction is preserved even among images of objects that are made unrecognizable and only retain low- and mid-level visual features of their natural version. In particular, in three experiments, healthy human adults saw rapid sequences of images (6 Hz) where every five exemplars of a category (i.e., animate), an exemplar of another category (i.e., inanimate) was shown (1.2 Hz). Using frequency-tagging electroencephalography (ftEEG), we found significant neural responses at 1.2 Hz, indicating rapid and automatic detection of the periodic categorical change. Moreover, such effect was found -although increasingly weaker- for 'impoverished' stimulus-sets that retained only certain (high-, mid- or low-level) features of the original colorful images (i.e., grayscale, texform and phase-scrambled images), and even if the images were unrecognizable. Similar effects were found with two Deep Neural networks (DNNs) presented with the same stimulus-sets. In sum, reliable categorization effects for dramatically impoverished and unrecognizable images, in humans' EEG and DNN data, demonstrate that animacy representation emerges early in the visual hierarchy and is remarkably resilient to the loss of visual information.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 30%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Hard-to-beat animacy perception: EEG evidence of accurate animate-inanimate distinction for ambiguous objects
Farzad Rostami, Céline Spriet, … Liuba Papeo·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2026
- Perceiving animacy in 'identical' images
Tal Boger, Chaz Firestone·eLifePeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2026
- Asymmetric compression of representational space for object animacy categorization under degraded viewing conditions
Tijl Grootswagers, J. Brendan Ritchie, … Thomas A. Carlson·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 18, 2017
- MEG sensor patterns reflect perceptual but not categorical similarity of animate and inanimate objects
Daria Proklova, DANIEL H. KAISER, Marius V. Peelen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2019
- Untangling featural and conceptual object representations
Tijl Grootswagers, Amanda K. Robinson, … Thomas A. Carlson·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 7, 2019
- Mid-level feature differences underlie early animacy and object size distinctions: Evidence from EEG decoding
Ruosi Wang, Daniel Janini, Talia Konkle·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2022