henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivNeuroscience

Tonic resting-state hubness supports high-frequency activity defined verbal-memory encoding network in epilepsy

Ganne ChaitanyaiD, Walter A. Hinds, James E. KrageliD, Xiaosong HeiD, Noah Sideman, Youssef EzzyatiD, Michael R. SperlingiD, Ashwini Dayal SharaniD, Joseph I. TracyiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

High-frequency gamma activity of verbal-memory encoding using invasive-electroencephalogram coupled has laid the foundation for numerous studies testing the integrity of memory in diseased populations. Yet, the functional connectivity characteristics of networks subserving these HFA-memory linkages remains uncertain. By integrating this electrophysiological biomarker of memory encoding from IEEG with resting-state BOLD fluctuations, we estimated the segregation and hubness of HFA-memory regions in drug-resistant epilepsy patients and matched healthy controls. HFA-memory regions express distinctly different hubness compared to neighboring regions in health and in epilepsy, and this hubness was more relevant than segregation in predicting verbal memory encoding. The HFA-memory network comprised regions from both the cognitive control and primary processing networks, validating that effective verbal-memory encoding requires multiple functions, and is not dominated by a central cognitive core. Our results demonstrate a tonic intrinsic set of functional connectivity, which provides the necessary conditions for effective, phasic, task-dependent memory encoding.\n\nHighlightsO_LIHigh frequency memory activity in IEEG corresponds to specific BOLD changes in resting-state data.\nC_LIO_LIHFA-memory regions had lower hubness relative to control brain nodes in both epilepsy patients and healthy controls.\nC_LIO_LIHFA-memory network displayed hubness and participation (interaction) values distinct from other cognitive networks.\nC_LIO_LIHFA-memory network shared regional membership and interacted with other cognitive networks for successful memory encoding.\nC_LIO_LIHFA-memory network hubness predicted both concurrent task (phasic) and baseline (tonic) verbal-memory encoding success.\nC_LI

Citations
5
FWCI
0.29
Field percentile
top 41%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.