bioRxivNeuroscience
Tonic resting-state hubness supports high-frequency activity defined verbal-memory encoding network in epilepsy
Ganne ChaitanyaiD, Walter A. Hinds, James E. KrageliD, Xiaosong HeiD, Noah Sideman, Youssef EzzyatiD, Michael R. SperlingiD, Ashwini Dayal SharaniD, Joseph I. TracyiD
Abstract
High-frequency gamma activity of verbal-memory encoding using invasive-electroencephalogram coupled has laid the foundation for numerous studies testing the integrity of memory in diseased populations. Yet, the functional connectivity characteristics of networks subserving these HFA-memory linkages remains uncertain. By integrating this electrophysiological biomarker of memory encoding from IEEG with resting-state BOLD fluctuations, we estimated the segregation and hubness of HFA-memory regions in drug-resistant epilepsy patients and matched healthy controls. HFA-memory regions express distinctly different hubness compared to neighboring regions in health and in epilepsy, and this hubness was more relevant than segregation in predicting verbal memory encoding. The HFA-memory network comprised regions from both the cognitive control and primary processing networks, validating that effective verbal-memory encoding requires multiple functions, and is not dominated by a central cognitive core. Our results demonstrate a tonic intrinsic set of functional connectivity, which provides the necessary conditions for effective, phasic, task-dependent memory encoding.\n\nHighlightsO_LIHigh frequency memory activity in IEEG corresponds to specific BOLD changes in resting-state data.\nC_LIO_LIHFA-memory regions had lower hubness relative to control brain nodes in both epilepsy patients and healthy controls.\nC_LIO_LIHFA-memory network displayed hubness and participation (interaction) values distinct from other cognitive networks.\nC_LIO_LIHFA-memory network shared regional membership and interacted with other cognitive networks for successful memory encoding.\nC_LIO_LIHFA-memory network hubness predicted both concurrent task (phasic) and baseline (tonic) verbal-memory encoding success.\nC_LI
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: spatial domain detection
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Field percentile
- top 41%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Spatiotemporal dynamics between interictal epileptiform discharges and ripples during associative memory processing
Simon E. Henin, Anita Shankar, … Anli A. Liu·BrainPeer-reviewed·Feb 9, 2021
- A Theta Band Network Involving Prefrontal Cortex Unique To Human Episodic Memory
James Young, Peter H. Rudebeck, … Mark G. Baxter·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 22, 2018
- Divergent Electrophysiological Responses in the Human Hippocampus During Verbal Memory Processing
Weichen Huang, Julian Quabs, … Josef Parvizi·bioRxiv·Jan 29, 2026
- Functional synchronization between hippocampal sEEG, parietal ECoG and scalp EEG during a verbal working memory task.
Vasileios S. Dimakopoulos, Ece Boran, … Johannes Sarnthein·bioRxiv·Jun 5, 2020
- Increased task-dependent functional connectivity by stimulation of the hippocampal network predicts memory enhancement
Kristen Warren, Molly S. Hermiller, … Joel L. Voss·bioRxiv·Jun 20, 2019
- Hippocampal patterns and associative memory: Distinct intracranial EEG temporal encoding patterns support memory
Alice M Xue, Shaw Hsu, … Anthony D. Wagner·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2026