Extended floral longevity does not increase seed production under experimental pollinator decline
Abstract
Premise of researchIn plant species that depend on pollinators to produce seeds, declines in pollinator populations should strengthen natural selection for floral traits that increase outcross pollen receipt by increasing the probability of pollinator visitation. One such trait is floral longevity, the amount of time that a flower is open and functional. If flowers that are open longer have a higher probability of pollinator visitation and this pollination benefit outweighs the resource cost of maintaining floral tissue, then pollinator decline should strengthen selection for extended floral longevity. MethodologyTo test whether pollinator decline could strengthen selection for extended longevity, we studied the pollinator-dependent species Lobelia siphilitica. We exposed L. siphilitica plants to either an ambient open-pollination treatment or a reduced open-pollination treatment that simulates pollinator decline. Within each pollination treatment, we measured floral longevity and seeds per fruit and used these data to estimate directional selection on longevity. This experiment was repeated twice. Pivotal resultsIn one experiment, there was significant selection within both ambient and reduced pollination treatments for shortened (rather than extended) floral longevity. In the other experiment, selection on floral longevity within both ambient and reduced pollination treatments was not significantly different from zero. ConclusionsWe found no evidence of selection for extended floral longevity, regardless of the pollination environment. These results suggest that pollinator decline will not strengthen selection for extended longevity and thus that pollinator-dependent species such as L. siphilitica may not respond to pollinator decline by evolving extended floral longevity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pollination and abiotic stress alter the distribution of variation in floral longevity and opportunities for adaptation
Rachel B. Spigler, Susanna Ostrowski·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2025
- Evolution of pollination-induced plasticity of flower longevity
K. Xu·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2023
- Abiotic pollen loss: The neglected pollen fate
Bruce Anderson, Sam McCarren, … Vinícius Lourenço Garcia de Brito·bioRxiv·Mar 12, 2026
- Changing pollination rates affect plant life history strategies
Dylan T. Simpson, William K. Petry, … Amy Marie Iler·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2026
- Adaptive generalization in pollinators: hawkmoths increase fitness to long-tubed flowers, but secondary pollinators remain important
Katherine E. Wenzell, Johnathan Y. Zhang, … Jeremie Benjamin Fant·Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2024
- Male-biased sexual selection persists across contrasting habitats in a dioecious plant
Camille Jolivel, Nina Joffard, … Isabelle De Cauwer·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2026