Journal of Proteome ResearchBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
How to train a post-processor for tandem mass spectrometry proteomics database search while maintaining control of the false discovery rate
Jack FreestoneiD, Lukas KälliD, William Stafford NobleiD, Uri KeichiD
Abstract
Decoy-based methods are a popular choice for the statistical validation of peptide detections in tandem mass spectrometry proteomics data. Such methods can achieve a substantial boost in statistical power when coupled with post-processors such as Percolator that use auxiliary features to learn a better-discriminating scoring function. However, we recently showed that Percolator can struggle to control the false discovery rate (FDR) when reporting the list of discovered peptides. To address this problem, we introduce Percolator-RESET, which is an adaptation of our recently developed RESET meta-procedure to the peptide detection problem. Specifically, Percolator-RESET fuses Percolators iterative SVM training procedure with RESETs general framework of determining the list of reported discoveries in a target-decoy competition setup, where each putative discovery is augmented with a list of relevant features. Percolator-RESET operates in both a standard single-decoy mode and a two-decoy mode, the latter requiring the generation of two decoys per target. We demonstrate that Percolator-RESET controls the FDR in both modes, both theoretically and empirically, while typically reporting only a marginally smaller number of discoveries than Percolator in single-decoy mode. The two-decoy mode is marginally more powerful than both Percolator and the single-decoy mode and exhibits less variability than the latter.
- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Field percentile
- top 16%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Re-investigating the correctness of decoy-based false discovery rate control in proteomics tandem mass spectrometry
Jack Freestone, William Stafford Noble, Uri Keich·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 30, 2024
- Beyond target-decoy competition: stable validation of peptide and protein identifications in mass spectrometry-based discovery proteomics
Yohann Couté, Christophe Bruley, Thomas Bürger·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2020
- Quality control for the target decoy approach for peptide identification
Elke Debrie, Milan Malfait, … Lieven Clement·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2023
- Target-decoy false discovery rate estimation using Crema
Andy Lin, Donavan See, … William Stafford Noble·PROTEOMICSPeer-reviewed·Feb 21, 2024
- Improving peptide-level mass spectrometry analysis via double competition
Andy Lin, Temana Short, … Uri Keich·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2022
- diagFDR: Verifiable False Discovery Rate Reporting in Proteomics via Scope, Calibration, and Stability Diagnostics
Marie Chion, Alexandre Godmer, … Quentin Giai Gianetto·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2026