metamicrobiomeR: an R package for analysis of microbiome relative abundance data using zero-inflated beta GAMLSS and meta-analysis across studies using random effect models
Abstract
BackgroundThe rapid growth of high-throughput sequencing-based microbiome profiling has yielded tremendous insights into human health and physiology. Data generated from high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons are often preprocessed into composition or relative abundance. However, reproducibility has been lacking due to the myriad of different experimental and computational approaches taken in these studies. Microbiome studies may report varying results on the same topic, therefore, meta-analyses examining different microbiome studies to provide robust results are important. So far, there is still a lack of implemented methods to properly examine differential relative abundances of microbial taxonomies and to perform meta-analysis examining the heterogeneity and overall effects across microbiome studies.\n\nResultsWe developed an R package metamicrobiomeR that applies Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) with a zero-inflated beta (BEZI) family (GAMLSS-BEZI) for analysis of microbiome relative abundance datasets. Both simulation studies and application to real microbiome data demonstrate that GAMLSS-BEZI well performs in testing differential relative abundances of microbial taxonomies. Importantly, the estimates from GAMLSS-BEZI are log(odds ratio) of relative abundances between groups and thus are comparable between microbiome studies. As such, we also apply random effects meta-analysis models to pool estimates and their standard errors across microbiome studies. We demonstrate the meta-analysis workflow and highlight the utility of our package on four studies comparing gut microbiomes between male and female infants in the first six months of life.\n\nConclusionsGAMLSS-BEZI allows proper examination of microbiome relative abundance data. Random effects meta-analysis models can be directly applied to pool comparable estimates and their standard errors to evaluate the heterogeneity and overall effects across microbiome studies. The examples and workflow using our metamicrobiomeR package are reproducible and applicable for the analyses and meta-analyses of other microbiome studies.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 90
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Scale Reliant Mixed Effects Models Enhance Microbiome Data Analysis
Kyle C. McGovern, Justin D. Silverman·MicrobiomePeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2026
- MIMOSA2: A metabolic network-based tool for inferring mechanism-supported relationships in microbiome-metabolome data
C. Noecker, A. Eng, E. Borenstein·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2021
- LorMe: a streamlined and interoperable R framework for end-to-end microbiome analysis
Ningqi Wang, Yaozhong Zhang, … Zhong Wei·MicroBiome and One HealthPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- A multi-view model for relative and absolute microbial abundances
Brian D. Williamson, James P. Hughes, Amy D. Willis·BiometricsPeer-reviewed·May 28, 2021
- MIDASim: a fast and simple simulator for realistic microbiome data
Mengyu He, Ni Zhao, Glen A. Satten·MicrobiomePeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2024
- Semisynthetic Simulation for Microbiome Data Analysis
Kris Sankaran, Saritha Kodikara, … Kim‐Anh Lê Cao·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2024