bioRxivMicrobiology
Beneficial and detrimental genes in the cellular response to replication arrest
L. Schons-Fonseca, M. D. Lazova, J. L. Smith, A. D. Grossman
Abstract
DNA replication is essential for all living organisms, and a variety of events can perturb replication, including DNA damage (e.g., pyrimidine dimers, crosslinking) and replication arrest due to "roadblocks" such as DNA-binding proteins or transcription. Bacteria have several well-characterized mechanisms for repairing damaged DNA and restoring functional replication forks. However, little is known about the repair of stalled or arrested replication forks in the absence of DNA lesions. Using a library of random transposon insertions in Bacillus subtilis, we identified 35 genes that affect the ability of cells to survive arrest of replication elongation, in the absence of DNA damage. Genes identified included those involved in iron-sulfur homeostasis, cell envelope biogenesis, and DNA repair and recombination. In B. subtilis, and many bacteria, two nucleases (AddAB and RecJ) are involved in early steps in repairing replication forks arrested by DNA damage. Loss of either one causes increased sensitivity to DNA damage. These single-strand nucleases resect DNA ends, leading to assembly of the recombinase RecA onto the single stranded DNA. Notably, we found that disruption of recJ increased survival of cells following replication arrest, indicating that, in the absence of DNA damage, RecJ is detrimental to surviving replication arrest. In contrast, and as expected, disruption of addA decreased survival of cells following replication arrest, indicating that AddA promotes survival. The different phenotypes of addA and recJ mutants appeared to be due to differences in assembly of RecA onto DNA. RecJ promoted too much assembly of RecA, and loss of RecA compensated for the detrimental effects of RecJ. Our results indicate that in the absence of DNA lesions, RecA is dispensable for cells to survive replication arrest and the stable RecA nucleofilaments favored by the RecJ pathway may lead to cell death by preventing proper processing of the arrested replication fork.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rescuing the bacterial replisome at a nick requires recombinational repair and helicase reloading
Charles Winterhalter, Kathryn J. Stratton, … Heath D. Murray·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 26, 2025
- DisA limits RecA- and RadA/Sms-mediated replication fork remodelling to prevent genome instability
R. Torres, J. C. Alonso·bioRxiv·Nov 23, 2020
- Bacillus subtilis remains translationally active after CRISPRi-mediated replication initiation arrest
V. Munoz-Gutierrez, F. A. Cornejo, … E. Charpentier·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2022
- Role for DNA double strand end-resection activity of RecBCD in control of aberrant chromosomal replication initiation in Escherichia coli
S. Goswami, J. Gowrishankar·bioRxiv·May 28, 2022
- Hierarchy and heterogeneity in the recruitment of B. subtilis replication-restart proteins to stalled forks
Robert C. Raatz, Daniel R Hammerl, … Peter L. Graumann·bioRxiv·Mar 23, 2026
- DnaE uses strand displacement synthesis during Okazaki fragment repair
Abigail H. Kendal, Frances Caroline Lowder, … Lyle A. Simmons·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2026