Successful exome capture and sequencing in lemurs using human baits
Timothy H. WebsteriD, Elaine E. GuevaraiD, Richard R. Lawler, Brenda J. BradleyiD
Abstract
ObjectivesWe assessed the efficacy of exome capture in lemurs using commercially available human baits.\n\nMaterials and MethodsWe used two human kits (Nimblegen SeqCap EZ Exome Probes v2.0; IDT xGen Exome Research Panel v1.0) to capture and sequence the exomes of wild Verreauxs sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi, n = 8), a lemur species distantly related to humans. For comparison, we also captured exomes of a primate species more closely related to humans (Macaca mulatta, n= 4). We mapped reads to both the human reference assembly and the most closely related reference for each species before calling variants. We used measures of mapping quality and read coverage to compare capture success.\n\nResultsWe observed high and comparable mapping qualities for both species when mapped to their respective nearest-relative reference genomes. When investigating breadth of coverage, we found greater capture success in macaques than sifakas using both nearest-relative and human assemblies. Exome capture in sifakas was still highly successful with more than 90% of annotated coding sequence in the sifaka reference genome captured, and 80% sequenced to a depth greater than 7x using Nimblegen baits. However, this success depended on probe design: the use of IDT probes resulted in substantially less callable sequence at low-to-moderate depths.\n\nDiscussionOverall, we demonstrate successful exome capture in lemurs using human baits, though success differed between kits tested. These results indicate that exome capture is an effective and economical genomic method of broad utility to evolutionary primatologists working across the entire primate order.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genomic Skimming and Nanopore Sequencing Uncover Cryptic Hybridization in One of World's Most Threatened Primates
J. Malukiewicz, R. A. Cartwright, … C. Roos·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2021
- Assessing group size and the demographic composition of unhabituated northern muriqui (Brachyteles hypoxanthus) using non-invasive biomonitoring
Mariane da Cruz Kaizer, Naiara Guimarães Sales, … Allan D. McDevitt·Remote Sensing in Ecology and ConservationPeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2025
- The lemur baseline: How lemurs compare to monkeys and apes in the Primate Cognition Test Battery
C. Fichtel, K. Dinter, P. M. Kappeler·PeerJPeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2020
- Comparative analyses of two primate species diverged by more than 60 million years show different rates but similar distribution of genome-wide UV repair events
Ümit Akköse, Veysel Oğulcan Kaya, … Ogün Adebalı·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2021
- Noninvasive genetic sampling of two flying fox species provides a high rate of genotyping success and a low error rate during amplification
M. T. Ibouroi, A. Cheha, A. Besnard·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2021
- Potential evolutionary body size reduction in a Malagasy primate (Propithecus verreauxi) in response to human size-selective hunting pressure
A. P. Sullivan, L. R. Godfrey, … G. H. Perry·bioRxiv·Mar 23, 2020