Genetics in MedicineGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Rare variants found in clinical gene panels illuminate the genetic and allelic architecture of orofacial clefting
Kimberly K. Diaz Perez, Sarah W. CurtisiD, Alba Sanchis‐JuaniD, Xuefang ZhaoiD, S. Taylor HeadiD, Samantha HoiD, Bridget Carter, Toby Goldstein McHenry, Madison R. BishopiD, Luz Consuelo Valencia‐Ramirez, Claudia RestrepoiD, Jacqueline T. HechtiD, Lina M. Moreno UribeiD, George L. WehbyiD, Seth Michael WeinbergiD, Terri H. BeatyiD, Jeffrey Clark MurrayiD, Eleanor FeingoldiD, Mary L. MarazitaiD, David J. CutleriD, Michael P. EpsteiniD, Harrison BrandiD, Elizabeth J. LeslieiD
Abstract
PurposeOrofacial clefts (OFCs) are common birth defects including cleft lip (CL), cleft lip and palate (CLP), and cleft palate (CP). OFCs have heterogeneous etiologies, complicating clinical diagnostics as it is not always apparent if the cause is Mendelian, environmental, or multifactorial. Sequencing is not currently performed for isolated or sporadic OFCs, so we estimated the diagnostic yield for 418 genes in 841 cases and 294 controls. MethodsWe evaluated 418 genes using genome sequencing and curated variants to assess their pathogenicity using American College of Medical Genetics criteria. Results9.04% of cases and 1.02% of controls had likely pathogenic (LP) variants (p<0.0001), which was almost exclusively driven by heterozygous variants in autosomal genes. CP (17.6%) and CLP (9.09%) cases had the highest yield while CL cases had a 2.80% yield. Out of 39 genes with LP variants, nine genes, including CTNND1 and IRF6, accounted for more than half of the yield (4.64% of cases). Most variants (61.8%) were variants of uncertain significance (VUSs), occurring more frequently in cases (p=0.004), but no individual gene showed a significant excess of VUSs. ConclusionThese results underscore the etiological heterogeneity of OFCs and suggest sequencing could reduce the diagnostic gap in OFCs.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 21
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Field percentile
- top 6%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comprehensive analysis of de novo variants across 2,497 orofacial cleft trios reveals novel genetic drivers of disease
Nehir Edibe Kurtas, Alba Sanchis‐Juan, … Harrison Brand·medRxiv·May 24, 2026
- Rare genetic variants in SEC24D modify orofacial cleft phenotypes
Sarah W. Curtis, Jenna C. Carlson, … Elizabeth J. Leslie·medRxiv·Mar 24, 2023
- Diagnostic outcomes of exome gene panel sequencing in patients with unusual syndromic cleft lip/palate phenotypes
Mohammad Reza Jabalameli·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2018
- Rare variants found in multiplex families with orofacial clefts: Does expanding the phenotype make a difference?
Kimberly K. Diaz Perez, Sydney Chung, … Elizabeth J. Leslie·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part APeer-reviewed·Jun 23, 2023
- Variants in CALD1, ESRP1, and RBFOX1 are associated with orofacial cleft risk
Jenna C. Carlson, Xinyi Zhang, … John R. Shaffer·medRxiv·Jan 21, 2025
- The PAX1 locus at 20p11 is a modifier for bilateral cleft lip only
Sarah W. Curtis, Daniel Chang, … Elizabeth J. Leslie·Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jan 30, 2021