Stereotactic and Functional NeurosurgeryNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Stimulation related artifacts and a multipurpose template-based offline removal solution for a novel sensing-enabled deep brain stimulation device
Lauren H. HammeriD, Ryan B. KochanskiiD, Philip A. StarriD, Simon J LittleiD
Abstract
BackgroundThe Medtronic "Percept" is the first FDA approved deep brain stimulation (DBS) device with sensing capabilities during active stimulation. Its real-world signal recording properties have yet to be fully described. ObjectiveThis study details sources of artifact (and potential mitigations) in local field potential (LFP) signals collected by the Percept, and assesses the potential impact of artifact on the future development of adaptive DBS (aDBS) using this device. MethodsLFP signals were collected from seven subjects in both experimental and clinical settings. The presence of artifacts and their effect on the spectral content of neural signals were evaluated in both the stimulation ON and OFF states using three distinct offline artifact removal techniques. ResultsTemplate subtraction successfully removed multiple sources of artifact, including 1) electrocardiogram (ECG), 2) non-physiologic polyphasic artifacts, and 3) ramping related artifacts seen when changing stimulation amplitudes. ECG removal from stimulation ON (at 0 mA) signals recovered the spectral shape seen when OFF stimulation (averaged difference in normalized power in theta, alpha, and beta bands [≤] 3.5%). ECG removal using singular value decomposition was similarly successful, though required subjective researcher input. QRS interpolation produced similar recovery of beta-band signal, but resulted in residual low-frequency artifact. ConclusionsArtifacts present when stimulation is enabled notably affected the spectral properties of sensed signals using the Percept. Multiple discrete artifacts could be successfully removed offline using an automated template subtraction method. The presence of unrejected artifact likely influences online power estimates, with the potential to affect aDBS algorithm performance.
- Citations
- 51
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Field percentile
- top 3%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Estimation of Periodic Signals with Applications to Deep Brain Stimulation
Paula X. Chen, Taewoo Kim, … Jérôme Darbon·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- A comparison of methods to suppress electrocardiographic artifacts in local field potential recordings
Mariëlle J. Stam, Bernadette C.M. van Wijk, … Arthur W.G. Buijink·Clinical NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2022
- Robust Removal of Slow Artifactual Dynamics Induced by Deep Brain Stimulation in Local Field Potential Recordings using SVD-based Adaptive Filtering
Nooshin Bahador, Josh Saha, … Milad Lankarany·BioengineeringPeer-reviewed·Jun 14, 2023
- A cardiac pulse signal affects local field potentials recorded from deep brain stimulation electrodes across clinical targets
Katherine Tourigny, Rory J. Piper, … Joram J. van Rheede·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2026
- Combining Magnetoencephalography with Telemetric Streaming of Intracranial Recordings and Deep Brain Stimulation - a Feasibility Study
Mansoureh Fahimi Hnazaee, Matthias Sure, … Vladimir Litvak A·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2023
- A Method for Electrical Stimulus Artifact Removal Exploiting Neural Refractoriness: Validation by Contrasting Cathodic and Anodic Stimulation
Arie Nakhmani, J. Block, … Harrison C. Walker·bioRxiv·Oct 6, 2024