bioRxivEcology
Identifying conservation priorities in a defaunated tropical biodiversity hotspot
A. Tilker, J. F. Abrams, A. Nguyen, L. Hoerig, J. Axtner, J. Louvrier, B. M. Rawson, H. A. Q. Nguyen, F. Guegan, T. V. Nguyen, M. Le, R. Sollmann, A. Wilting
Abstract
AimUnsustainable hunting is leading to widespread defaunation across the tropics. To mitigate against this threat with limited conservation resources, stakeholders must make decisions on where to focus anti-poaching activities. Identifying priority areas in a robust way allows decision-makers to target areas of conservation importance, therefore maximizing the impact of conservation interventions.\n\nLocationAnnamite mountains, Vietnam and Laos.\n\nMethodsWe conducted systematic landscape-scale surveys across five study sites (four protected areas, one unprotected area) using camera-trapping and leech-derived environmental DNA. We analyzed detections within a Bayesian multi-species occupancy framework to evaluate species responses to environmental and anthropogenic influences. Species responses were then used to predict occurrence to unsampled regions. We used predicted species richness maps and occurrence of endemic species to identify areas of conservation importance for targeted conservation interventions.\n\nResultsAnalyses showed that habitat-based covariates were uninformative. Our final model therefore incorporated three anthropogenic covariates as well as elevation, which reflects both ecological and anthropogenic factors. Conservation-priority species tended to found in areas that are more remote now or have been less accessible in the past, and at higher elevations. Predicted species richness was low and broadly similar across the sites, but slightly higher in the more remote site. Occupancy of the three endemic species showed a similar trend.\n\nMain conclusionIdentifying spatial patterns of biodiversity in heavily-defaunated landscapes may require novel methodological and analytical approaches. Our results indicate to build robust prediction maps it is beneficial to sample over large spatial scales, use multiple detection methods to increase detections for rare species, include anthropogenic covariates that capture different aspects of hunting pressure, and analyze data within a Bayesian multi-species framework. Our models further suggest that more remote areas should be prioritized for anti-poaching efforts to prevent the loss of rare and endemic species.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Global vertebrate hotspots
Harith M. Farooq, Michael Harfoot, … Jonas Geldmann·bioRxiv·May 14, 2026
- Hotspot prioritizations show sensitivity to data type
K. E. A. Norman, E. P. White·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2019
- Sampling bias and uneven data coverage shape observed biodiversity patterns in a megadiverse island archipelago hotspot
Kier Mitchel E. Pitogo, Camila G. Meneses, … Rafe M. Brown·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 17, 2026
- Rosettes in a matrix: Predicting spatial variation in density of a large felid in a forest-production mosaic
Anish Paul, Nitish Kumar, … Aritra Kshettry·Integrative ConservationPeer-reviewed·Nov 12, 2024
- Integrating spatial, phylogenetic, and threat assessment data from frogs and lizards to identify areas for conservation priorities in Peninsular Malaysia
K. O. Chan, L. Grismer·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2021
- Addressing the Southeast Asian snaring crisis: impact of 11 years of snare removal in a biodiversity hotspot
A. Tilker, J. Niedballa, … A. Wilting·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2023