Not two sides of the same coin: Divergent effects of motor state on corticospinal and cortical responses to TMS of motor cortex
Mikkel Malling BeckiD, Lasse ChristianseniD, Marieke Heyl, Angela MastropasquaiD, Sybren Van HoornwederiD, Axel ThielscheriD, Leo TomaseviciD, Hartwig Roman SiebneriD
Abstract
BackgroundTranscranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex can elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in target muscles, reflecting corticospinal excitability. MEP amplitudes increase with TMS intensity and can be facilitated by tonic muscle pre-activation. Since conventional transcranial evoked potentials (TEPs) also grow with increasing TMS intensity, cortical and corticospinal responses are often considered two facets of the same process. If this were true, changes in physiological motor state should modulate TEPs and MEPs in a similar manner. MethodsTo compare the state-dependency of cortical and corticospinal responses to single-pulse TMS, we simultaneously recorded TEPs and MEPs in 16 healthy young adults during relaxation and isometric contraction of the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. For each condition, 100 biphasic TMS pulses were delivered to the left primary motor hand area at five different intensities centered around the resting motor threshold. ResultsTEP and MEP amplitudes increased with stimulation intensity. As predicted, tonic muscle contraction consistently facilitated MEP. On the contrary, muscle contraction attenuated two key peaks of the TEP (N15 and N100). The state-dependent effects of corticospinal and cortical responses were not correlated. DiscussionBoth TEPs and MEPs are reliably modulated by motor state, yet they differ in direction and their magnitudes do not scale with each other. These findings challenge the assumption that cortical and corticospinal responses are two aspects of the same process. MEP facilitation during contraction likely reflects increased spinal excitability, whereas TEP attenuation may reflect reduced responsiveness of cortico-cortical or cortico-subcortical networks.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Brain-State-Resolved Consistency of Corticospinal Responses with EEG-TMS
Timo van Hattem, Juliana Hougland, … Ulf Ziemann·bioRxiv·May 28, 2026
- The Spectral Features Of EEG Responses To Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Of The Primary Motor Cortex Depend On The Amplitude Of The Motor Evoked Potentials
Matteo Fecchio, Andrea Pigorini, … Mario Rosanova·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2017
- State dependent motor cortex stimulation reveals distinct mechanisms for corticospinal excitability and cortical responses
Nipun D. Perera, Miles Wischnewski, … Alexander Opitz·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2024
- The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation
Mana Biabani, Alex Fornito, … Nigel C. Rogasch·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 18, 2021
- Matching Corticospinal and Cortical Excitability along the motor cortex: TMS-EMG-EEG study
Maria Nazarova, Macey Higdon, … Hanna Renvall·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2026
- EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities
Natalie Schaworonkow, Jochen Triesch, … Christoph Zrenner·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2018