Propylene glycol-based antifreeze as an effective preservative for DNA metabarcoding of benthic arthropods
Chloe Victoria RobinsoniD, Teresita M. PorteriD, Michael WrightiD, Mehrdad HajibabaeiiD
Abstract
Maintaining the integrity of DNA in bulk environmental samples from source to laboratory is crucial for capturing the true range of taxa present within an ecosystem. Preservation consideration of DNA is particularly important if samples are being collected in remote areas and by non-specialist citizen scientists in nationwide programs. Traditionally, absolute ethanol is used as the preferred preservative for environmental samples collected for downstream DNA metabarcoding analyses. However, transport, shipping and DNA extraction of samples preserved in ethanol is a lengthy procedure due to safety restrictions and the requirement of full ethanol evaporation prior to extraction. We examined the efficacy of an easily accessible, non-toxic propylene glycol-based antifreeze as an alternative to absolute ethanol for preserving macroinvertebrate DNA from bulk-benthos DNA samples. We tested the differences in both cytochrome oxidase I (COI) exact sequence variants (ESVs) and COI taxonomic orders detected in both ethanol and antifreeze samples using two processing methods (no evaporation of preservative versus full evaporation). In addition, we assessed the detection of families and genera within the Arthropoda phylum for preservative type, site and processing method. Our results suggest that antifreeze is a suitable alternative to ethanol, a greater global ESV richness reported for antifreeze samples. Additionally, a higher proportion of arthropod reads in ESVs were detected in antifreeze (average 69%) compared with ethanol (average 53%). Finally, antifreeze samples produced similar results for the different processing methods, whereas ethanol samples failed to produce similar results without prior evaporation. Although ethanol is currently widely used for DNA preservation, our results demonstrate that by using antifreeze, it is possible to achieve similar taxonomic coverage and community assemblages of bulk-benthos DNA samples for macroinvertebrates, with the added simplicity and shorter laboratory processing time achieved using an easily available, unregulated preservative.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 28
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Field percentile
- top 9%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The effect of ethanol concentration on the morphological and molecular preservation of insects for biodiversity studies
D. Marquina, M. Buczek, … P. Lukasik·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2020
- Best practice recommendations for sample preservation in metabarcoding studies: a case study on diatom environmental samples
Ana Baričević, Chardon Cécile, … Agnès Bouchez·bioRxiv·May 4, 2022
- Recovering historical fish eDNA from museum-preserved Antarctic filter feeders via non-destructive metabarcoding.
Gert‐Jan Jeunen, Sadie Mills, … Neil J. Gemmell·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2025
- A practical evaluation of sampling filtration and preservation of environmental DNA samples for the water column monitoring.
Thierry Baussant, Adriana Królicka, … Thomas Merzi·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2026
- DNA metabarcoding from sample fixative as a quick and voucher preserving biodiversity assessment method
Vera Marie Alida Zizka, Florian Leese, … Matthias F. Geiger·GenomePeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2018
- Influence of Preservation Methods, Sample Medium and Sampling Time on eDNA Recovery in a Neotropical River
Naiara Guimarães Sales, Owen Simon Wangensteen, … Stefano Mariani·Environmental DNAPeer-reviewed·May 31, 2019