Divergent Behavioral Responses to Resource Limitations by Honey Bees, Bumble Bees, and Mason Bees
Lindsie M. McCabeiD, Kelsey K. GrahamiD, Byron LoveiD, Jonathan Berenguer Uhuad KochiD, C. I. Huntzinger, Diana Cox-FosteriD
Abstract
Resource limitation is a central ecological phenomenon shaping pollinator behavior, reproduction, and community dynamics. Many studies have looked at these interactions, but few have forced competition and explored species-specific responses. Here, we experimentally evaluated behavioral and reproductive responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera), bumble bees (Bombus impatiens), and mason bees (Osmia bruneri) in controlled single and multispecies foraging environments. Across all treatments, each species exhibited distinct forms of behavioral compensation when exposed to increased interspecific competition. Apis mellifera reduced the number of foraging events in mixed species cages yet showed variation in colony growth. B. impatiens increased foraging effort when co-foraging with other species, but this heightened activity did not translate into increased colony growth. O. bruneri maintained consistent foraging effort across treatments but exhibited reduced reproduction and a marked shift in floral host use, switching from preferred species (Phacelia tanacetifolia and Melilotus alba) to less-preferred alternatives (Collinsia grandiflora and Trifolium incarnatum) when competing with social bees. Regardless of compensatory behaviors, all three species demonstrated reduced reproductive success under competitive conditions. Our findings underscore the importance of evaluating interspecific competition when placing managed bees in natural or semi-natural habitats to avoid inadvertently stressing wild or managed bee populations and taking into consideration species-specific responses in addition to community level responses to competition.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pollinator traits and competitive context shape dynamic foraging behavior in bee communities.
Heather M. Briggs, Berry J. Brosi·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2017
- Bumblebees develop more efficient traplines than honey bees
A. Buatois, T. Dubois, M. Lihoreau·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2020
- Human landscape modification shapes foraging preferences and sucrose responsiveness of honey bees in Asia
Gifty Alin Jacob, Manish Ravi, … Ricarda Scheiner·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2026
- Honeybee hive density has consequences for foraging bumblebees in Irish heathlands
Katherine L. W. Burns, Lina Herbertsson, Dara Anne Stanley·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2025
- Contrasting effects of land cover on nesting habitat use and reproductive output for bumble bees
G. Pugesek, E. E. Crone·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2020
- Foraging task specialization in honey bees (Apis mellifera): the contribution of floral rewards on the learning performance of pollen and nectar foragers