Associations of waterbirds with harvesting and ploughing events in rice fields: increasing foraging opportunities or just gathering for the feast?
João PaulinoiD, José P. GranadeiroiD, Edna CorreiaiD, Teresa CatryiD
Abstract
Surges in food availability create localized but intense foraging opportunities, often attracting multi-species consumer groups. Agricultural practices can trigger these surges, prompting bird associations. However, the strength and duration of the association, as well as its drivers, remain unclear. This study examines waterbird association with harvesting and ploughing events in rice fields. The duration and magnitude of these associations were determined and three hypotheses addressed to explain them: (1) increased food availability, (2) enhanced foraging success and (3) reduced time allocated to vigilance. Waterbird counts and GPS tracking revealed strong associations with management events. Bird numbers spiked during events but declined within one to two days. Food availability (and soil penetrability) increased significantly during events - crayfish and rice during harvesting, worms and soil penetrability during ploughing - supporting Hypothesis 1. However, this did not improve foraging performance (intake rate, foraging success), rejecting Hypothesis 2. Higher competition, interference or kleptoparasitism in these large mixed-species flocks may offset increased food availability benefits. Alternatively, functional responses of target species may limit prey intake due to physiological or behavioural constraints. Hypothesis 3 was also unsupported, as birds did not reduce vigilance. It is plausible that birds may be drawn to events by the perception of a feast, not actual benefits. Gregariousness and foraging behaviour by "local enhancement" may explain such associations. Results highlight the complexity of bird responses to food surges while suggesting waterbirds in rice fields maintain stable foraging performance during agricultural management events and otherwise, indicating resilience to agricultural timing shifts.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 31%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Avifauna composition in Rice plantations: effects of Harvesting Stage and Surrounding Vegetation. Insights from Weppa Farm, Agenebode.
Ilyas Ibrahim, Benhilda Antonio, … Chukuma Dike·bioRxiv·Oct 20, 2024
- Distress feeding of depredatory birds in Sunflower and Sorghum protected by bioacoustics
S.S. Mahesh, V. Vasudeva Rao, … K. Swamy·bioRxiv·Oct 9, 2017
- Migratory herbivorous waterfowl track multiple resource waves during spring migration
- A tale of two species: human and peafowl interactions in human dominated landscape influence each others behaviour
D. Paranjpe, P. Dange·bioRxiv·Jul 25, 2019
- Multispecies relations shape bird-feeding practices
Tuomas Aivelo, Mikko Aulio, … Anttoni Kervinen·npj BiodiversityPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2025
- Wetland birds in the northern prairie pothole region may show sensitivity to agriculture.
J. N. Daniel, H. Polan, R. C. Rooney·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2020