Marriage in the Melting Pot: An evolutionary approach to European ancestry, homogamy and fertility in the United States
Abstract
ObjectiveTo understand marriage patterns, homogamy and fertility of women of European ancestry in the United States from an evolutionary perspective we aim to investigate if a prevalence for ancestral homogamy exists, the factors influencing a female preference for an ancestral homogamous vs. an heterogamous marriage, if an ancestral homogamous vs. heterogamous marriages influences fertility and if there is an inherted component of the tendency to marry homogamously vs. heterogamously. Furthermore we aim to determine the heritability of homogamous vs. heterogamous marriage behaviour. MethodsWe used the census data of 369,121 US women married only once and aged between 46 and 60 years, provided by IPUMS USA (https://usa.ipums.org/usa/). We used linear mixed models to determine associations of the probability of a homogamous vs. heterogamous marriage and the individual fertility of a women. We aimed to estimate the heritability (in our case genetic & parental environment) of marriage behaviour using a linear mixed model. ResultsWe found, that ancestral heterogamous marriages are more frequent (56.5%), compared to homogamous marriages (43.5%). Most of the variance in inter- ancestry marriage and fertility is explained by ancestry per se, followed by the ratio of individuals of a certain ancestral background in a county: the more individuals of a certain ancestry live in a county the lower is the tendency to marry someone of a different ancestral background. Furthermore we found that about 11.8% of the marriage behaviour is heritable. Being in a homogamous marriage as well as the income of the spouse are both significantly positively associated with the number of children a women has and the probability that a women has at least one child. DiscussionThe most important explaining factor (in terms of variance explained) for being in an ancestral homogamous vs. heterogamous marriage, for number of children, as well as childlessness is the ancestry of the women. Albeit we are not able to distinguish the genetic and social heritability on basis of our data, with a total value of 11.8% variance explained, only a small heritability for in-group vs, out-group marriage behaviour is indicated.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assortative mating on ancestry-variant traits in admixed Latin American populations
Emily T. Norris, Lavanya Rishishwar, … I. King Jordan·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2019
- Differentiating mechanism from outcome for ancestry-assortative mating in admixed human populations
Dashiell J. Massey, Zachary A. Szpiech, Amy Goldberg·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 7, 2025
- The genetic ancestry of African, Latino, and European Americans across the United States.
Katarzyna Bryc, Eric Y. Durand, … Joanna L. Mountain·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2014
- Assortative mating by population of origin in a mechanistic model of admixture
A. Goldberg, A. Rastogi, N. A. Rosenberg·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2019
- The Effects of Migration and Assortative Mating on Admixture Linkage Disequilibrium
Noah Zaitlen, Scott Huntsman, … Eran Halperin·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2017
- The genomic footprint of social stratification in admixing American populations
Àlex Mas-Sandoval, Sara Mathieson, Matteo Fumagalli·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2023