henhaobio
Sign in

The Journal of Physical Chemistry BBiophysicsPeer-reviewed journal article

The monomeric conformational ensembles of Aβ40 and Aβ42 encode their differential amyloid aggregation propensity

Irene Cadenelli, Andrea Ciccolo, Andrea TagliabueiD, Giulia RossiiD, Valeria Conti Nibali, Davide BochicchioiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

A{beta}40 and A{beta}42 peptides differ by just two C-terminal residues, yet they display strikingly different aggregation and toxicity profiles. Whether this distinction is already encoded at the monomer level is still under debate. Here, we combine extensive all-atom simulations in explicit solvent, well-tempered metadynamics, and a tailored consensus cluster analysis to compare the monomeric ensembles of the two isoforms under identical conditions. Both peptides populate broad, coil-like conformational distributions; however, A{beta}42 shows systematically higher {beta}-structure propensity, especially in the C-terminal region, and samples more extended conformations with higher hydrophobic exposure compared to A{beta}40. These results support a mechanistic link between sequence-encoded monomer conformational preferences and the differential amyloidogenicity of the two isoforms, highlighting monomer-level determinants of A{beta}42s distinct aggregation behavior.

Citations
2
FWCI
9.03
Field percentile
top 2%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISChakraborty '20Barz '20Maximiano '26Watts '17Saha '26Kurisaki '22
78% semantic matchBiophysics
D. Chakraborty, J. E. Straub, D. Thirumalai·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences·Jul 30, 2020