Sign in
NeuroscienceImaging Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

A Double-Blind Replication Attempt of Offline 5Hz-rTUS-Induced Corticospinal Excitability

Po‐Yu FongiD, Benjamin R. KopiD, Carys EvansiD, Vidya Gani Wijaya, Yongling LiniD, Drew CappottoiD, Jenny S. A. Lee, Anna LatorreiD, Joy Song, Bradley E. TreebyiD, Eleanor M. MartiniD, John C. RothwelliD, Lennart VerhageniD, Sven BestmanniD

Abstract

IntroductionTranscranial ultrasound stimulation (TUS) is a promising new form of non-invasive neuromodulation. As a nascent technique, replication of its effects on brain function is important. Of particular interest is offline 5Hz repetitive TUS (5Hz-rTUS), originally reported by Zeng and colleagues [1] to elicit lasting corticospinal excitability increases, with large effect sizes. Material and methodHere, we conducted a pre-registered (https://osf.io/p5n4q) replication of this protocol that benefitted from three additional features: double-blind application of TUS, neuronavigation for consistent TMS positioning, and acoustic simulations to assess M1 target exposure to TUS. Changes in resting motor thresholds (rMT), motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) in response to TUS (5Hz-rTUS vs. sham) were measured in the right first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles, with unbiased selection of participants. Transducer location was determined by the TMS-hotspot for motor representations of the right FDI, as in the original work. ResultsNo significant effects of 5Hz-TUS (vs sham) were observed. Post-hoc simulations showed considerable variability of the acoustic focus, which was outside the anatomical M1-hand area in 67% of participants - in line with the known poor correspondence of TMS-hotspot location and M1-hand area. ConclusionOur results indicate that the effect sizes of the neuromodulatory effects of 5Hz-rTUS on M1 may be more variable than previously appreciated. We suggest that double-blinding, neuronavigated TMS, individualised acoustic simulations for TUS targeting and pre-registration will aid reproducibility across studies.

PDFDOIData

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
11
FWCI
3.97
Field percentile
top 6%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLaugesen '26Kop '24Heimbuch '22Yu '20Legon '18Ai '18
82% semantic matchNeuroscience
J. Laugesen, Salvatore Bertino, B. Sigurðsson+4 more·Scientific Reports·Sep 18, 2026· 1 citations