Accounting for unobserved population dynamics and aging error in close-kin mark-recapture assessments
J. D. Swenson, E. N. Brooks, D. Kacev, C. Boyd, M. Kinney, B. Marcy-Quay, A. Seveque, K. Feldheim, L. M. Komoroske
Abstract
Obtaining robust estimates of population abundance is a central challenge hindering the conservation and management of many threatened and exploited species. Close-kin mark-recapture (CKMR) is a genetics-based approach that has strong potential to improve monitoring of data-limited species by enabling estimates of abundance, survival, and other parameters for populations that are challenging to assess. However, CKMR models have received limited sensitivity testing under realistic population dynamics and sampling scenarios, impeding application of the method in population monitoring programs and stock assessments. Here, we use individual-based simulation to examine how unmodeled population dynamics and aging uncertainty affect the accuracy and precision of CKMR parameter estimates under different sampling strategies. We then present adapted models that correct the biases that arise from model misspecification. Our results demonstrate that a simple base-case CKMR model produces robust estimates of population abundance with stable populations that breed annually; however, if a population trend or non-annual breeding dynamics are present, or if year-specific estimates of abundance are desired, a more complex CKMR model must be constructed. In addition, we show that CKMR can generate reliable abundance estimates for adults from a variety of sampling strategies, including juvenile-focused sampling where adults are never directly observed (and aging error is minimal). Finally, we apply a CKMR model that has been adapted for population growth and intermittent breeding to two decades of genetic data from juvenile lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris) in Bimini, Bahamas, to demonstrate how application of CKMR to samples drawn solely from juveniles can contribute to monitoring efforts for highly mobile populations. Overall, this study expands our understanding of the biological factors and sampling decisions that cause bias in CKMR models, identifies key areas for future inquiry, and provides recommendations that can aid biologists in planning and implementing an effective CKMR study, particularly for long-lived data-limited species.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Simulation-based inference for close-kin mark-recapture: implications for small populations and nonrandom mating
Paul B. Conn·EnvironmetricsPeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2025
- Close-kin mark-recapture methods to estimate demographic parameters of mosquitoes
Y. Sharma, J. B. Bennett, … J. M. Marshall·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2022
- Close-kin methods to estimate census size and effective population size
R. S. Waples, P. Feutry·bioRxiv·Jan 19, 2021
- Simulation-based spatially explicit close-kin mark-recapture
Gilia Patterson, Claire K. Goodfellow, … Peter L. Ralph·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Nov 6, 2025
- kinference: Pairwise kinship detection for Close-Kin Mark-Recapture
Mark V. Bravington, Shane M. Baylis, … Pierre Feutry·bioRxiv·May 21, 2026
- Estimation of adult census size from close-kin dyads in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae
Anita Lerch, Scott T. Small, … Nora J. Besansky·Evolutionary ApplicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2026