BMC BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
geneRFinder: gene finding in distinct metagenomic data complexities
Raíssa SilvaiD, Kleber PadovaniiD, Fabiana Rodrigues de GóesiD, Ronnie Cley de Oliveira AlvesiD
Abstract
MotivationMicrobes perform a fundamental economic, social and environmental role in our society. Metagenomics makes it possible to investigate microbes in their natural environments (the complex communities) and their interactions. The way they act is usually estimated by looking at the functions they play in those environments and their responsibility is measured by their genes. The advances of next-generation sequencing technology have facilitated metagenomics research however it also create a heavy computational burden. Large and complex biological datasets are available as never before. There are many gene predictors available which can aid gene annotation process though they lack of handling appropriately metagenomic data complexities. There is no standard metagenomic benchmark data for gene prediction. Thus, gene predictors may inflate their results by obfuscating low false discovery rates. ResultsWe introduce geneRFinder, a ML-based gene predictor able to outperform state-of-the-art gene prediction tools across this benchmark by using only one pre-trained Random Forest model. Average prediction rates of geneRFinder differed in percentage terms by 54% and 64%, respectively, against Prodigal and FragGeneScan while handling high complexity metagenomes. The specificity rate of geneRFinder had the largest distance against FragGeneScan, 79 percentage points, and 66 more than Prodigal. According to McNemars test, all percentual differences between predictors performances are statistically significant for all datasets with a 99% confidence interval. ConclusionsWe provide geneRFinder, a approach for gene prediction in distinct metagenomic complexities, available at github.com/railorena/geneRFinder, and also we provide a novel, comprehensive benchmark data for gene prediction -- which is based on The Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI) challenge, and contains labeled data from gene regions - avaliable at sourceforge.net/p/generfinder-benchmark.
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 0.71
- Field percentile
- top 37%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- GENERanno: A Genomic Foundation Model for Metagenomic Annotation
Qiuyi Li, Wei Wu, … Zheng Wang·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2025
- LAMPP: A benchmark for continuous evaluation of host phenotype prediction from shotgun metagenomic data
Netta Barak, Haimasree Bhattacharya, … Moran Yassour·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2025
- No one tool to rule them all: Prokaryotic gene prediction tool performance is highly dependent on the organism of study
Nicholas J Dimonaco, Wayne Aubrey, … Christopher J. Creevey·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2021
- Whokaryote: distinguishing eukaryotic and prokaryotic contigs in metagenomes based on gene structure
Lotte J. U. Pronk, Marnix H. Medema·Microbial GenomicsPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2022
- An evaluation of the accuracy and speed of metagenome analysis tools
Stinus Lindgreen, Karen L Adair, Paul Gardner·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2016
- Comprehensive Benchmarking and Ensemble Approaches for Metagenomic Classifiers
Alexa B. R. McIntyre, Rachid Ounit, … Christopher E. Mason·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2017