bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
dar: A Consensus-Based Framework for Differential Abundance Testing in Microbiome Data
Judit Farré-Badia, Marc Noguera-JuliániD, Roger ParedesiD, Francesc Català‐MolliD
Abstract
SummaryThe dar R package streamlines differential abundance (DA) testing in microbiome research by integrating state-of-the-art DA methods--such as DESeq2, ALDEx2, ANCOM-BC, and MetagenomeSeq--within a customizable consensus-based framework, thereby enhancing the robustness and reproducibility of DA results. Leveraging microbiome data in phyloseq or TreeSummarizedExperiment formats, dar organizes analysis steps in a modular recipe object, enabling users to easily incorporate preprocessing tasks such as taxonomic filtering, rarefaction, and subsetting, alongside multiple DA analysis methods. Dedicated visualization tools facilitate the definition of a consensus by illustrating the overlap among methods, empowering users to refine analysis strategies and display final results. Reproducibility is supported through functions that export and import entire analysis workflows, making dar a comprehensive solution for addressing the complex, high-dimensional nature of microbiome data. Availability and implementationdar is an R package available from Bioconductor [≥] 3.19 (https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/dar) for R [≥] 4.4. The software is distributed under the MIT License and includes example datasets. Contactfcatala@irsicaixa.es Supplementary informationAdditional documentation is available at https://microbialgenomics-irsicaixaorg.github.io/dar
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- ConsensusMetaDA: an R Package for consensus-based differential abundance analysis of metagenomic data.
Manoharan Kumar, Matthew A. Field·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2025
- Commonly used compositional data analysis implementations are not advantageous in microbial differential abundance analyses benchmarked against biological ground truth
Samuel David Gamboa-Tuz, Marcel Ramos, … Levi Waldron·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2025
- Implications of taxonomic bias for microbial differential-abundance analysis
Michael R. McLaren, Jacob T. Nearing, … Benjamin J. Callahan·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2022
- Benchmarking Differential Abundance Analysis Methods for Correlated Microbiome Sequencing Data
Lu Yang, Jun Chen·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2022
- Microbiome differential abundance methods produce disturbingly different results across 38 datasets
Jacob T. Nearing, Gavin M. Douglas, … Morgan G. I. Langille·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2022
- A Permutation-Based Framework for Evaluating Bias in Microbiome Differential Abundance Analysis
Ke Zeng, Anthony A. Fodor·bioRxiv·May 11, 2026