Sign in
Evolutionary BiologybioRxiv

High satellite repeat turnover in great apes studied with short- and long-read technologies

M. Cechova, R. S. Harris, M. Tomaszkiewicz, B. Arbeithuber, F. Chiaromonte, K. D. Makova

Abstract

BackgroundSatellite repeats are a structural component of centromeres and telomeres, and in some instances their divergence is known to drive speciation. Due to their highly repetitive nature, satellite sequences have been understudied and underrepresented in genome assemblies. To investigate their turnover in great apes, we studied satellite repeats in human, chimpanzee, bonobo, gorilla, and Sumatran and Bornean orangutans, using unassembled short and long sequencing reads.\n\nResultsThe density of satellite repeats, as identified from accurate short reads (Illumina), varied greatly among great ape genomes. These were dominated by a handful of abundant repeated motifs, frequently shared among species, which formed two groups: (1) the (AATGG)n repeat (critical for heat shock response) and its derivatives; and (2) subtelomeric 32-mers. Using the densities of abundant repeats, individuals could be classified into species. However clustering did not reproduce the accepted species phylogeny, suggesting rapid repeat evolution. Several abundant repeats were enriched in males vs. females; using existing Y chromosome assemblies or FIuorescent In Situ Hybridization, we validated location for some of them on the Y. Finally, applying a novel computational tool, we identified many satellite repeats completely embedded within long Oxford Nanopore and Pacific Biosciences reads. Such repeats were up to 59 kb in length and consisted of perfect repeats interspersed with other similar sequences.\n\nConclusionsOur results based on sequencing reads generated with three different technologies provide the first detailed characterization of great ape satellite repeats, and open new avenues for exploring their functions.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSaid '24Włodzimierz '26Vondrak '19Logsdon '21Glushkevich '26Logsdon '24
64% semantic matchGenomics
Iskander Said, Daniel A. Barbash, Andrew G. Clark·Genome Biology and Evolution·Jul 16, 2024· 5 citations