NODDI-DTI: extracting neurite orientation and dispersionparameters from a diffusion tensor
Abstract
NODDI-DTI is a simplification of the NODDI model that, when its underlying assumptions are met, allows extraction of biophysical parameters from standard single-shell DTI data, permitting biophysical analysis of DTI datasets.\n\nIn contrast to the NODDI signal model, the NODDI-DTI signal model contains no CSF compartment, restricting its application to voxels with very low CSF partial-volume contamination. This simplification allowed derivation of simple analytical relations between parameters representing axon density, v and dispersion,{tau} , and DTI invariants (MD and FA) through moment expansion of the NODDI-DTI signal model. These relations formally allow extraction of biophysical parameters from DTI data. It should be emphasised that the NODDI-DTI model inherits the strong assumptions of the NODDI model, and so is nominally restricted to analysis of healthy brains.\n\nNODDI-DTI parameter estimates were computed by applying the proposed analytical relations to DTI parameters extracted from the first shell of data, and compared to parameters extracted by fitting the NODDI-DTI model to (i) both shells (recommended) and (ii) the first shell (as for DTI) of data in the white matter of three different in vivo diffusion datasets. NODDI-DTI parameters estimated from DTI and NODDI-DTI parameters estimated by fitting the model to the first shell of data gave similar errors compared to two-shell NODDI-DTI estimates. The NODDI-DTI method gave unphysical parameter estimates in a small percentage of voxels, reflecting voxelwise DTI estimation error or NODDI-DTI model invalidity. In the course of evaluating the NODDI-DTI model it was found that diffusional kurtosis strongly biased DTI-based MD values, and so a novel heuristic correction requiring only DTI data was derived and used to account for this bias.\n\nOur results demonstrate that NODDI-DTI is a promising model and technique to interpret restricted datasets acquired for DTI analysis with greater biophysical specificity, though its limitations must be borne in mind.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Estimating axial diffusivity in the NODDI model
Amy F.D. Howard, Michiel Cottaar, … Saâd Jbabdi·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 2, 2022
- Optimizing the intrinsic parallel diffusivity in NODDI: an extensive empirical evaluation
J. M. Guerrero, N. Aduluru, … A. L. Alexander·bioRxiv·May 8, 2019
- Diffusion Tensor Model links to Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging at high b-value in Cerebral Cortical Gray Matter
Hikaru Fukutomi, Matthew F. Glasser, … Takuya Hayashi·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 22, 2019
- Investigating apparent differences between standard DKI and axisymmetric DKI and its consequences for biophysical parameter estimates
J. M. Oeschger, K. Tabelow, S. Mohammadi·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2023
- Not all voxels are created equal: reducing estimation bias in regional NODDI metrics using tissue-weighted means
Christopher S Parker, Thomas D. Veale, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2021
- Advantages of Multi-shell Diffusion Models for Studies of Brain Development in Youth
Adam Robert Pines, Matthew Cieslak, … Theodore Daniel Satterthwaite·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2019