The Plant JournalGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Pinaceae show elevated rates of gene duplication and gene loss that are robust to incomplete gene annotation
Abstract
Gene duplications and gene losses are major determinants of genome evolution and phenotypic diversity. The frequency of gene turnover (gene gains and gene losses combined) is known to vary between organisms. Comparative genomic analyses of gene families can highlight such variation; however, estimates of gene turnover rates may be biased when using highly fragmented genome assemblies resulting in poor gene annotations. Here, we address potential biases introduced by gene annotation errors in estimates of gene turnover frequencies in a dataset including both well-annotated angiosperm genomes and the incomplete gene sets of four Pinaceae including two pine species, Norway spruce and Douglas-fir. Previous studies have shown low overall substitution rates, but higher levels of adaptive substitutions, in genes from Pinaceae and other gymnosperms compared to angiosperms. Conversely, our analysis suggests that pines experienced higher gene turnover rates than angiosperm lineages lacking recent whole-genome duplications. This finding is robust to both known major issues in Pinaceae gene sets: missing gene models and erroneous annotation of pseudogenes. A separate analysis limited to the four Pinaceae gene sets confirmed an accelerated gene turnover rate in pines compared to Norway spruce and Douglas-fir. Our results indicate that gene turnover significantly contributes to genome variation and possibly to adaptation and speciation in Pinaceae. Moreover, these findings indicate that reliable estimates of gene turnover frequencies can be discerned in incomplete and potentially inaccurate gene sets.
- organism: multiple species
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Field percentile
- top 19%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Gene duplications and phylogenomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic evolution in gymnosperms
G. W. Stull, X.-J. Qu, … T.-S. Yi·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2021
- Plastome phylogenomic study of Gentianeae (Gentianaceae): widespread gene tree discordance and its association with evolutionary rate heterogeneity of plastid genes
- Fossils matter: improved estimates of divergence times in Pinus reveal older diversification
Bianca Saladin, Andrew B Leslie, … Niklaus E Zimmermann·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2016
- Chinese fir genome and the evolution of gymnosperms
Sizu Lin, Yu Chen, … Zhong‐Jian Liu·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2022
- Factors influencing gene family size variation among related species in a plant family
P. Wang, B. M. Moore, … S.-H. Shiu·bioRxiv·Feb 23, 2018
- The Perfect Storm: Gene Tree Estimation Error, Incomplete Lineage Sorting, and Ancient Gene Flow Explain the Most Recalcitrant Ancient Angiosperm Clade, Malpighiales
L. Cai, Z. Xi, … C. C. DAVIS·bioRxiv·May 26, 2020