bioRxivBiophysicsPreprint
Protein Language Models Encode Evolutionary Grammar but Conflate Topological and Thermodynamic Phases
Abstract
How a one-dimensional sequence encodes a dynamic thermodynamic ensemble rather than a static geometry remains a fundamental biophysical challenge. While protein language models achieve high structural accuracy from single sequences, it remains unclear whether they internalize physical folding principles or merely capture evolutionary statistical correlations. We investigate this representational capacity by analyzing the latent manifold of ESM-2 across 11068 proteins, focusing on fundamental exceptions to the Anfinsen assumption: intrinsically disordered, fold-switching, and knotted proteins. We demonstrate that ESM-2 integrates out microscopic backbone geometry during feature extraction. It instead forms a macroscopic sequence grammar manifold that separates random sequences while ordering biological proteins along physicochemical composition gradients. Consequently, the model exhibits topological aliasing. It conflates these physically distinct categories because they frequently share overlapping sequence statistics despite divergent three-dimensional topologies. A region-replacement experiment establishes this aliasing as an intrinsic characteristic rather than an artifact of sequence dilution, and a structure-aware control model (SaProt) demonstrates that explicit structural tokens partially alleviate topological blindness for static anomalies while failing to resolve multi-state thermodynamic phases. Furthermore, local curvature analysis reveals class-invariant geometric turbulence that homogenizes microscopic details while preserving macroscopic distinguishability. ESM-2 therefore functions as an evolutionary grammar compressor rather than a microscopic threedimensional geometry encoder, imposing defined boundaries on tasks requiring high-precision geometric awareness and necessitating integration with explicit physical constraints.
- assay: protein sequence
- research focus: protein folding & dynamics
- approach: deep learning
- approach: contrastive learning
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The geometry of hidden representations of protein language models
Valeriani Lucrezia, Francesca Cuturello, … Alberto Cazzaniga·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2022
- Structure tokens sharpen the feature vocabulary of protein language models
Jacob Lucas Steenwyk·bioRxiv·May 14, 2026
- Distilling structural representations into protein sequence models
Jeffrey Ouyang-Zhang, Chengyue Gong, … Daniel J. Diaz·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2024
- Conformational sampling and interpolation using language-based protein folding neural networks
D. del Alamo, J. R. Jeliazkov, … J. Karpiak·bioRxiv·Dec 16, 2023
- Protein language models learn evolutionary statistics of interacting sequence motifs
Zhidian Zhang, Hannah K. Wayment-Steele, … Sergey Ovchinnikov·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2024
- Advancing Knotted Protein Design with ESM3: Guided Generation and Topological Insights
Eva Marsalkova, Petr Šimeček·Machine Learning HealthPeer-reviewed·Sep 7, 2026