Neuroscience of ConsciousnessNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
The Dream Catcher experiment: Blinded analyses disconfirm markers of dreaming consciousness in EEG spectral power
William WongiD, Valdas NoreikaiD, Levente MóróiD, Antti RevonsuoiD, Jennifer WindtiD, Katja ValliiD, Naotsugu TsuchiyaiD
Abstract
The Dream Catcher test defines the criteria for a genuine discovery of the neural constituents of phenomenal consciousness. Passing the test implies that some patterns of purely brain-based data directly correspond to the subjective features of phenomenal experience, which would help to bridge the explanatory gap between consciousness and brain. Here, we conducted the Dream Catcher test for the first time in a graded and simplified form, capturing its core idea. The experiment involved a Data Team, who measured participants brain activity during sleep and collected dream reports, and a blinded Analysis Team, who was challenged to predict better than chance, based solely on brain measurements, whether or not a participant had a dream experience. Using a serial-awakening paradigm, the Data Team prepared 54 one-minute polysomnograms of NREM sleep--27 of dreamful sleep (3 from each of the 9 participants) and 27 of dreamless sleep--redacting from them all associated participant and dream information. The Analysis Team attempted to classify each recording as either dreamless or dreamful using an unsupervised machine learning classifier, based on hypothesis-driven, extracted features of EEG spectral power and electrode location. The procedure was repeated over five iterations with a gradual removal of blindness. At no level of blindness did the Analysis Team perform significantly better than chance, suggesting that EEG spectral power does not carry any signatures of phenomenal consciousness. Furthermore, we demonstrate an outright failure to replicate key findings of recently reported correlates of dreaming consciousness.\n\nHighlightsThe first reported attempt of the Dream Catcher test.\nThe correlates of conscious experience may not lie in EEG spectral power.\nReported markers of NREM dreaming consciousness misperformed in a blinded setting.\nThose markers also could not be confirmed in an unblinded setting.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 40
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural Signatures of Conscious Experience During Sleep: A Serial Awakening Study Using High-Density EEG
Atakan Selte, Steven E. Haworth, … Aaron F. Struck·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2026
- The neural correlates of dreaming
Francesca Siclari, Benjamin Baird, … Giulio Tononi·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 10, 2017
- Criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of consciousness
Johannes J. Fahrenfort, Philippa Anne Johnson, … Simon van Gaal·bioRxiv·Feb 22, 2024
- A novel signature of visual awareness independent of post-perceptual processing
Michael A. Cohen, Cole Dembski, … Michael A. Pitts·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2024
- Non-REM parasomnia experiences share EEG correlates with dreams
Jacinthe Cataldi, Aurélie Stephan, … Francesca Siclari·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2023
- The determinants of the subjective perception of sleep: insights from a high-density EEG study with serial awakenings
Aurélie Stephan, Sandro Lecci, … Francesca Siclari·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2021