Sign in
PathologybioRxiv
Preprint

Automatic deep learning-based segmentation and quantification of stented arterial cross-sections for morphometric analysis

Max KraftbergeriD, Kristin Susan SpirgathiD, Tobias HaaseiD, Rubens BandeliniD, Tom MeyeriD, Noah JaitneriD, Heiko TzschätzschiD

Abstract

Arterial vascular diseases, such as atherosclerosis, are among the most serious global health threats. In preclinical studies, morphometric analysis of histological arterial cross-sections is considered the gold standard for assessing vascular remodeling and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. However, morphometric analysis is usually performed manually, which is time-consuming, subjective, and requires significant user interaction. This paper presents a fully automated, operator-independent framework for the precise morphometric analysis of stented arterial cross-sections, extending the previously developed qHisto (quantitative histology) framework for the quantification of various histological components. A neural network for the segmentation of arterial structures was trained and evaluated using 819 cross-sections. In addition, a quantitative analysis of vascular morphology, fibrin area, and lumen asymmetry was performed using 72 cross-sections from coated and uncoated balloons. The model achieved high segmentation accuracy with a median Dice similarity coefficient of 0.892-0.996. Compared to manual evaluation, the system reduces analysis time by 90%, enabling efficient processing of large datasets. Furthermore, morphometric analysis with qHisto showed significant differences between coated and uncoated balloons, e.g. regarding lumen area (AUC = 0.86) and fibrin ratio (AUC = 0.94). Our developed framework enables fully automated, comprehensive and standardized analysis of histological arterial cross-sections. This helps to reduce time-consuming, repetitive manual assessments and thus facilitates research of disease mechanisms and treatment effects in preclinical studies.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.