NLCD: A method to discover nonlinear causal relations among genes
Abstract
Distinguishing correlation from causation is a fundamental challenge in many scientific fields, including biology, especially when interventions like randomized controlled trials are infeasible and only observational data are available. Methods based on statistical tests of conditional independence within the Mendelian Randomization framework can detect causality between two observed variables that are each associated with a third instrumental variable. However, these methods for detecting causal relationships between traits (e.g., two gene expression or clinical traits associated with a genetic variant, all observed in the same population) often assume a linear relationship, thereby hindering the discovery of causal gene networks from genomics data.We have developed NLCD, a method for NonLinear Causal Discovery from genomics data based on nonlinear regression modeling and conditional feature importance scoring. NLCD uses these techniques to extend the statistical tests in an existing linear causal discovery method called the Causal Inference Test (CIT). We benchmarked NLCD against current state-of-the-art methods: CIT, Findr, and MRPC. On simulated datasets, NLCD performs comparably to most methods in detecting linear relations (Average AUPRC (Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve) of NLCD=0.94, CIT=0.94, Findr=0.94, and MRPC=0.99), and outperforms them in detecting nonlinear (sine and sawtooth type) relations between two genes (Average AUPRC of NLCD=0.76, CIT=0.60, Findr=0.56, and MRPC=0.73). When tested on a nonlinear subset of a yeast genomic dataset to recover known causal relations involving transcription factors, NLCD and CIT performed comparable to each other and slightly better than Findr and MRPC (Average AUPRC of NLCD=0.82, CIT=0.81, Findr=0.71, and MRPC=0.54). On application to a human genomic dataset, NLCD revealed active causal gene pairs (IRF1 [->] PSME1 and HLA-C [->] HLA-T) in the muscle tissue, and clarified the promises and challenges in discovering causal gene networks in tissues under in vivo human settings. AvailabilityThe code implementing our method is available at: https://github.com/BIRDSgroup/NLCD.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 44%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Robust discovery of causal gene networks via measurement error estimation and correction
Rahul Biswas, V P Brintha, … Manikandan Narayanan·bioRxiv·May 9, 2023
- Distinguishing genetic correlation from causation across 52 diseases and complex traits
Luke Jen O’Connor, Alkes L. Price·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2018
- Comparison between instrumental variable and mediation-based methods for reconstructing causal gene networks in yeast
Adriaan-Alexander Ludl, Tom Michoel·Molecular OmicsPeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2020
- Learning causal biological networks with the principle of Mendelian randomization
Md. Bahadur Badsha, Audrey Qiuyan Fu·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 21, 2019
- Existence of Causation without Correlation in Transcriptional Networks
Gerald M. Pao, Ethan R. Deyle, … George Sugihara·bioRxiv·Feb 10, 2026
- Orienting The Causal Relationship Between Imprecisely Measured Traits Using Genetic Instruments
Gibran Hemani, Kate M. Tilling, George Davey Smith·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 17, 2017