Distinguishing multiple-merger from Kingman coalescence using two-site frequency spectra
Eliot F. FentoniD, Daniel P. RiceiD, John NovembreiD, Michael M. DesaiiD
Abstract
Demographic inference methods in population genetics typically assume that the ancestry of a sample can be modeled by the Kingman coalescent. A defining feature of this stochastic process is that it generates genealogies that are binary trees: no more than two ancestral lineages may coalesce at the same time. However, this assumption breaks down under several scenarios. For example, pervasive natural selection and extreme variation in offspring number can both generate genealogies with "multiple-merger" events in which more than two lineages coalesce instantaneously. Therefore, detecting multiple mergers (and other violations of the Kingman assumptions) is important both for understanding which forces have shaped the diversity of a population and for avoiding fitting misspecified models to data. Current methods to detect multiple mergers in genomic data rely primarily on the site frequency spectrum (SFS). However, the signatures of multiple mergers in the SFS are also consistent with a Kingman coalescent with a time-varying population size. Here, we present a new statistical test for determining whether the Kingman coalescent with any population size history is consistent with population data. Our approach is based on information contained in the two-site joint frequency spectrum (2-SFS) for pairs of linked sites, which has a different dependence on the topologies of genealogies than the SFS. Our statistical test is global in the sense that it can detect when the genome-wide genetic diversity is inconsistent with the Kingman model, rather than detecting outlier regions, as in selection scan methods. We validate this test using simulations, and then apply it to demonstrate that genomic diversity data from Drosophila melanogaster is inconsistent with the Kingman coalescent.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Field percentile
- top 36%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Can the site-frequency spectrum distinguish exponential population growth from multiple-merger coalescents?
Bjarki Eldon, Matthias Birkner, … Fabian Freund·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2015
- Distinguishing coalescent models - which statistics matter most?
F. Freund, A. Siri-Jegousse·bioRxiv·May 31, 2020
- Bursts of coalescence within population pedigrees whenever big families occur
D. Diamantidis, W. T. Fan, … J. Wakeley·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2023
- Coalescence 2.0: a multiple branching of recent theoretical developments and their applications
Aurelien Tellier, Christophe Lemaire·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2014
- Estimating the Lambda measure in multiple-merger coalescents
V. Miro Pina, E. Joly, A. Siri-Jegousse·bioRxiv·Mar 10, 2023
- Simultaneous Inference of Past Demography and Selection from the Ancestral Recombination Graph under the Beta Coalescent
Kevin Korfmann, Thibaut Paul Patrick Sellinger, … Aurélien Tellier·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2024