Distinguishing coalescent models - which statistics matter most?
Abstract
Modelling genetic diversity needs an underlying genealogy model. To choose a fitting model based on genetic data, one can perform model selection between classes of genealogical trees, e.g. Kingmans coalescent with exponential growth or multiple merger coalescents. Such selection can be based on many different statistics measuring genetic diversity. A random forest based Approximate Bayesian Computation is used to disentangle the effects of different statistics on distinguishing between various classes of genealogy models. For the specific question of inferring whether genealogies feature multiple mergers, a new statistic, the minimal observable clade size, is introduced. When combined with classical site frequency based statistics, it reduces classification errors considerably.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Distinguishing multiple-merger from Kingman coalescence using two-site frequency spectra
Eliot F. Fenton, Daniel P. Rice, … Michael M. Desai·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 7, 2025
- Coalescent models at small effective population sizes and population declines are positively misleading
M. Elise Lauterbur·bioRxiv·Jul 16, 2019
- Inference with selection, varying population size and evolving population structure: Application of ABC to a forward-backward coalescent process with interactions
Clotilde Lepers, Sylvain Billiard, … Viet Chi Tran·HeredityPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2020
- The fractional coalescent
S. Mashayekhi, P. Beerli·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2018
- Can the site-frequency spectrum distinguish exponential population growth from multiple-merger coalescents?
Bjarki Eldon, Matthias Birkner, … Fabian Freund·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2015
- Quantifying uncertainty in the inference of generalized coalescents
Timothy C. Wallstrom, Tanmoy Bhattacharya A, Jon F. Wilkins·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2017