Sign in
NeurosciencePLoS ONE
Peer-reviewed journal article

Studying global processing in autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with gaze movements: The example of a copying task

Divya Prakash SeernaniiD, Chara Ioannou, K. Damania, Kurt P. SpindleriD, Holger HilliD, Tom FoulshamiD, Nikolaos SmyrnisiD, Stephan BenderiD, Christian FleischhakeriD, Monica Biscaldi, Ulrich Ebner‐PriemeriD, Christoph KleiniD

Abstract

Recent discussions in the literature, along with the revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) [2], suggest aetiological commonalities between the highly comorbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Addressing this discussion requires studying these disorders together by comparing constructs typical to each of them. In the present study, we investigate global processing, known to be difficult for participants with ASD, and Intra-Subject Variability (ISV), known to be consistently increased in participants with ADHD, in groups, aged 10-13 years, with ADHD (n=25), ASD without comorbid ADHD (ASD-) (n=13) and ASD with ADHD (ASD+) (n=18) in comparison with a typically developing group (n=22). A Copying task, typically requiring global processing and in this case particularly designed using equally complex stimuli to also measure ISV across trials, was selected. Oculomotor measures in this task proved to be particularly sensitive to group differences. While increased ISV was not observed in the present task in participants with ADHD, both ASD groups needed to look longer on the figure to be drawn, indicating that global processing takes longer in ASD. However, the ASD+ group needed to fixate on the figure only between drawing movements, whereas the ASD-group needed to do this throughout the drawing process. The present study provides evidence towards ASD and ADHD being separate, not-overlapping, disorders. Since the pure ASD-group was affected more by central coherence problems than the ASD+ group, it may suggest that neuropsychological constructs interact differently in different clinical groups and sub-groups.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
4
FWCI
0.27
Field percentile
top 49%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISDi '26Di '26Silvan '25Mauriello '22Tian '23Mihali '18
69% semantic matchNeuroscience
Xin Di, Bharat B. Biswal·bioRxiv·May 21, 2026· 1 citations