Accurate sequence variant genotyping in cattle using variation-aware genome graphs
Abstract
BackgroundThe genotyping of sequence variants typically involves as a first step the alignment of sequencing reads to a linear reference genome. Because a linear reference genome represents only a small fraction of sequence variation within a species, reference allele bias may occur at highly polymorphic or diverged regions of the genome. Graph-based methods facilitate to compare sequencing reads to a variation-aware genome graph that incorporates non-redundant DNA sequences that segregate within a species. We compared sensitivity and accuracy of graph-based sequence variant genotyping using the Graphtyper software to two widely used methods, i.e., GATK and SAMtools, that rely on linear reference genomes using whole-genomes sequencing data of 49 Original Braunvieh cattle.\n\nResultsWe discovered 21,140,196, 20,262,913 and 20,668,459 polymorphic sites using GATK, Graphtyper, and SAMtools, respectively. Comparisons between sequence variant and microarray-derived genotypes showed that Graphtyper outperformed both GATK and SAMtools in terms of genotype concordance, non-reference sensitivity, and non-reference discrepancy. The sequence variant genotypes that were obtained using Graphtyper had the lowest number of mendelian inconsistencies for both SNPs and indels in nine sire-son pairs with sequence data. Genotype phasing and imputation using the Beagle software improved the quality of the sequence variant genotypes for all tools evaluated particularly for animals that have been sequenced at low coverage. Following imputation, the concordance between sequence- and microarray-derived genotypes was almost identical for the three methods evaluated, i.e., 99.39, 99.29, and 99.52 % for GATK, SAMtools, and Graphtyper, respectively. Graphtyper required considerably more computing resources than SAMtools but it required less than GATK.\n\nConclusionsSequence variant genotyping using Graphtyper is accurate, sensitive and computationally feasible in cattle. Graph-based methods enable sequence variant genotyping from variation-aware reference genomes that may incorporate cohort-specific sequence variants which is not possible with the current implementations of state-of-the-art methods that rely on linear reference genomes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 49
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Field percentile
- top 5%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Bovine breed-specific augmented reference graphs facilitate accurate sequence read mapping and unbiased variant discovery
Danang Crysnanto, Hubert Pausch·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 27, 2020
- Fast and Accurate Genomic Analyses using Genome Graphs
Goran Rakocevic, Vladimir Semenyuk, … Deniz Kural·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 9, 2019
- Size and composition of haplotype reference panels impact the accuracy of imputation from low-pass sequencing in cattle
Audald Lloret‐Villas, Hubert Pausch, Alexander S. Leonard·Genetics Selection EvolutionPeer-reviewed·May 11, 2023
- Graphtyper: Population-scale genotyping using pangenome graphs
Hannes P. Eggertsson, Hákon Jónsson, … Bjarni V. Halldórsson·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 25, 2017
- Population-specific genome graphs improve high-throughput sequencing data analysis: A case study on the Pan-African genome
Huseyin Serhat Tetikol, Kübra Narcı, … Brandi N. Davis‐Dusenbery·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2021
- Sequence variation aware genome references and read mapping with the variation graph toolkit
Erik P. Garrison, Jouni Sirén, … Richard Michael Durbin·Nature BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2018