bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Genotype Imputation and Reference Panel: A Systematic Evaluation
Wei-Yang BaiiD, Xiao-Wei Zhu, Peikuan CongiD, Xue-Jun Zhang, John Brent RichardsiD, Hou‐Feng ZhengiD
- Citations
- 3
Abstract
Here, 622 imputations were conducted with 394 customized reference panels for Han Chinese and European populations. Besides validating the fact that the imputation accuracy could always benefit from the increased panel size when the reference panel was population-specific, the results brought two new thoughts as follows. First, when the haplotype size of reference panel was fixed, the imputation accuracy of common and low-frequency variants (MAF>0.5%) decreased while the population-diversity of reference panel increased, but for rare variants (MAF5%) for European population could always benefit from the expanding sample size. But for Han Chinese population, the accuracy of all imputed variants reached the highest when reference panel contained a fraction of extra diverse sample (15%[~]21%). In addition, we evaluated the existing reference panels such as the HRC and 1000G Phase3 and CONVERGE. For European population, HRC was the best reference panel. For Han Chinese population, we proposed an optimum constituent ratio for the Han Chinese imputation if researchers would like to customize their own sequenced reference panel, but a high quality and large-scale Chinese reference panel was still needed. Our findings could be generalized to the other populations with conservative genome, a tool was provided to investigate other populations of interest (https://github.com/Abyss-bai/reference-panel-reconstruction).\n\nHighlights (Key points)O_LIA total of 394 reference panels were designed and customized by three strategies, and large-scale genotype imputations were performed with these panels for systematic evaluation in Han Chinese and European populations.\nC_LIO_LIThe accuracy of imputed variants reached the highest when reference panel contains a fraction of extra diverse sample (15%[~]21%) for Han Chinese population, if the haplotype size of the reference panel was increased with extra samples, which is the most common cases.\nC_LIO_LIThe imputation accuracy showed the different trends between Han Chinese and European populations. In a sense, the European genome may more diverse than Han Chinese genome by itself.\nC_LIO_LIExisting reference panels were not the best choice for Chinese imputation, a high quality and large-scale Chinese reference panel was still needed.\nC_LI
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: imputation
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The effects of reference panel perturbations on the accuracy of genotype imputation
Jeremiah H. Li, Andy Liu, … Lex Flagel·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2023
- Genotype Imputation Performance of Three Reference Panels Using African Ancestry Individuals
Candelaria Vergara, Margaret M. Parker, … Priya Duggal·Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2018
- High-depth whole genome sequencing of a large population-specific reference panel: Enhancing sensitivity, accuracy, and imputation
Todd Lencz, Jin Yu, … Itsik Pe’er·Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2018
- A 515,579-Genome Reference Panel Improves Rare-Variant Imputation Across Multiple Underrepresented Populations
Franjo Ivankovic, Arthur Ko, … Lee Lichtenstein·medRxiv·Aug 31, 2026
- Imputation Efficacy Across Global Human Populations
Jordan Li Cahoon, Xinyue Rui, … Charleston W. K. Chiang·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 10, 2024
- Evaluation of imputation performance of multiple reference panels in a Pakistani population
Jiayi Xu, Dongjing Liu, … Laura M. Huckins·Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2024